"Woke" was term that originated from Social Justice Warriors, both of which emanated from those kinds of people as self-descriptors.
I personally don't use the term "woke" because it sounds childish, just as when the SJWs first used it back around the time of Gamergate. It was a low-IQ, smooth brain "I'm smart" word that progressives came up with to make themselves act as though they're superior, and to me, appropriating a word used by pseudo-intellectuals isn't smart.
It's far better to use proper political terms to describe their behavior. Yes, it might go over the sheep's heads or go ignored, but you have to get people to realize the history of these political movements and that this shit isn't new. It has a century-long history. If you want to destroy the progressives in totality, the sheep need to be shown where it originates from, not making it sound like this is a recent or new concept
It's far better to use proper political terms to describe their behavior.
"Better" is pretty subjective. Yes, proper terms may be more precise, but it doesn't piss off the commies nearly as much as when we take their jargon, turn it against them, and shove it up their ass.
People are idiots. If rational debate was all it took to convince them of something, everyone would already be a conservative. These people will only ever respond to power, and the best way to show that they have none is to mock them mercilessly until they STFU out of shame.
But it doesn't piss off the commies nearly as much as when we take their jargon, turn it against them, and shove it up their ass
They're pissed because the sheep have finally made a negative word association to the shit being forced onto them. We got lucky that those shoveling the "woke" boiled the frog too quickly or went too hot with their boil, and are starting to slightly suffer for it. Yet they persist...
People are idiots. If rational debate was all it took to convince them of something, everyone would already be a conservative
That's the bulk of my issue with the populace. Things may return to normal and our enemies will run away in shame, but the cycle will just start again because people never learn, especially if they aren't shown how things became the way they did. Explaining it better may give some hope that things take decades to cycle back instead of years.
The problem with this is that a lot of the woke aren’t motivated by consistent political beliefs.
Their rhetoric is clearly Marxist derived, but a lot of these people are not Communists or Marxist in any meaningful sense. The typical woke doesn’t give a shit about Marx, abolition of private property, seizing the means of production. They have no issues with billionaires or giant corporations, so long as they’re on their side.
Many of them are not revolutionaries in any way, they play defense for the government all the time (Democrats at least), and call people questioning things “threats to democracy”. From what I’ve seen, the only consistent through-line is hating straight white men, and blaming them for everything.
If the proper political term is “progressive”, I have to ask, how is this a meaningful distinction? Is “Woke” not just a pejorative term for Progressive, like Nazi for National Socialist?
"Woke" was term that originated from Social Justice Warriors, both of which emanated from those kinds of people as self-descriptors.
I personally don't use the term "woke" because it sounds childish, just as when the SJWs first used it back around the time of Gamergate. It was a low-IQ, smooth brain "I'm smart" word that progressives came up with to make themselves act as though they're superior, and to me, appropriating a word used by pseudo-intellectuals isn't smart.
It's far better to use proper political terms to describe their behavior. Yes, it might go over the sheep's heads or go ignored, but you have to get people to realize the history of these political movements and that this shit isn't new. It has a century-long history. If you want to destroy the progressives in totality, the sheep need to be shown where it originates from, not making it sound like this is a recent or new concept
"Better" is pretty subjective. Yes, proper terms may be more precise, but it doesn't piss off the commies nearly as much as when we take their jargon, turn it against them, and shove it up their ass.
People are idiots. If rational debate was all it took to convince them of something, everyone would already be a conservative. These people will only ever respond to power, and the best way to show that they have none is to mock them mercilessly until they STFU out of shame.
They're pissed because the sheep have finally made a negative word association to the shit being forced onto them. We got lucky that those shoveling the "woke" boiled the frog too quickly or went too hot with their boil, and are starting to slightly suffer for it. Yet they persist...
That's the bulk of my issue with the populace. Things may return to normal and our enemies will run away in shame, but the cycle will just start again because people never learn, especially if they aren't shown how things became the way they did. Explaining it better may give some hope that things take decades to cycle back instead of years.
The problem with this is that a lot of the woke aren’t motivated by consistent political beliefs. Their rhetoric is clearly Marxist derived, but a lot of these people are not Communists or Marxist in any meaningful sense. The typical woke doesn’t give a shit about Marx, abolition of private property, seizing the means of production. They have no issues with billionaires or giant corporations, so long as they’re on their side.
Many of them are not revolutionaries in any way, they play defense for the government all the time (Democrats at least), and call people questioning things “threats to democracy”. From what I’ve seen, the only consistent through-line is hating straight white men, and blaming them for everything.
If the proper political term is “progressive”, I have to ask, how is this a meaningful distinction? Is “Woke” not just a pejorative term for Progressive, like Nazi for National Socialist?