Specifically because he was so severely beaten and physically abused as a child that it caused permanent brain damage. This isn't a matter of simply being a crybaby or thin-skinned, he was actually disabled. That's not a "liberal" observation, that's a "watch the fucking movie" observation.
He is physically unable to control his laughter in stressful moments, to a point where he is shown to be coughing from the pain and lack of breath by the end of it. He had a fucking card to hand out for it because it happens so often and gets him into extreme trouble (which is how he ends up shooting those guys).
That precludes him from the vast majority of sectors of society because he might physically cease to function if stressed. Which means he is more disabled than anyone with Down Syndrome and many other things we give out disability for.
Though given how retarded you seem to be, I can see why he seems super functional from your position.
I know multiple people with tourettes which IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE DESCRIBING, who can work and function normally.
I watched the movie and saw nothing other than him being a piece of shit that was holding him back.
Laughing until it's hard to breath is not that bad, happens to me as well. That is an insane reach to say that makes him unable to function in society. Again, liberal thinking is that you can't overcome your issues and find your niche.
You think he couldn't be a landscaper because he laughs a lot?
It's almost like don't have a brain...
You are probably a kid though, still in school, otherwise you are a weak man, pathetic.
The first movie was boring imo, idk why people loved it.
I had friends say it really shows how some people suffer if left without help.
But I'm not a liberal so my thought was why couldn't he just man up the entire time.
It's literally a series for liberals, all my liberal friends loved it.
Specifically because he was so severely beaten and physically abused as a child that it caused permanent brain damage. This isn't a matter of simply being a crybaby or thin-skinned, he was actually disabled. That's not a "liberal" observation, that's a "watch the fucking movie" observation.
He literally was not disabled in the movie so that is straight up bs there, he was just angry.
What made you assume he was disabled? Brain damage doesn't automatically mean you are disabled.
Just because you freak out over bullshit doesn't mean you are disabled.
Maybe if he couldn't function as a human like eat, sleep or use the restroom..
He is physically unable to control his laughter in stressful moments, to a point where he is shown to be coughing from the pain and lack of breath by the end of it. He had a fucking card to hand out for it because it happens so often and gets him into extreme trouble (which is how he ends up shooting those guys).
That precludes him from the vast majority of sectors of society because he might physically cease to function if stressed. Which means he is more disabled than anyone with Down Syndrome and many other things we give out disability for.
Though given how retarded you seem to be, I can see why he seems super functional from your position.
Again liberal thinking.
I know multiple people with tourettes which IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE DESCRIBING, who can work and function normally.
I watched the movie and saw nothing other than him being a piece of shit that was holding him back.
Laughing until it's hard to breath is not that bad, happens to me as well. That is an insane reach to say that makes him unable to function in society. Again, liberal thinking is that you can't overcome your issues and find your niche.
You think he couldn't be a landscaper because he laughs a lot?
It's almost like don't have a brain...
You are probably a kid though, still in school, otherwise you are a weak man, pathetic.