I know multiple people with tourettes which IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE DESCRIBING, who can work and function normally.
I watched the movie and saw nothing other than him being a piece of shit that was holding him back.
Laughing until it's hard to breath is not that bad, happens to me as well. That is an insane reach to say that makes him unable to function in society. Again, liberal thinking is that you can't overcome your issues and find your niche.
You think he couldn't be a landscaper because he laughs a lot?
It's almost like don't have a brain...
You are probably a kid though, still in school, otherwise you are a weak man, pathetic.
Tourettes is a literal disability, legally defined as such. Which your own words is "Exactly" what I described him having.
Which means legally speaking, by you saying he is exactly equal to someone with tourettes, he is disabled.
You rushed to downplay his disability so fast you didn't realize what you were tacitly admitting in doing so. A classic sign of someone on the backfoot trying to move a goalpost.
Again liberal thinking.
I know multiple people with tourettes which IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE DESCRIBING, who can work and function normally.
I watched the movie and saw nothing other than him being a piece of shit that was holding him back.
Laughing until it's hard to breath is not that bad, happens to me as well. That is an insane reach to say that makes him unable to function in society. Again, liberal thinking is that you can't overcome your issues and find your niche.
You think he couldn't be a landscaper because he laughs a lot?
It's almost like don't have a brain...
You are probably a kid though, still in school, otherwise you are a weak man, pathetic.
So now you admit he is disabled, and not just angry. But now its just no big deal because you know a lot of people with tourettes.
Cool goalpost move my guy, at least you got to try and take a swipe at me to recover your ego.
I never admitted he was disabled idiot. you think people can't read or something?
Lying to what, cope?
L
Tourettes is a literal disability, legally defined as such. Which your own words is "Exactly" what I described him having.
Which means legally speaking, by you saying he is exactly equal to someone with tourettes, he is disabled.
You rushed to downplay his disability so fast you didn't realize what you were tacitly admitting in doing so. A classic sign of someone on the backfoot trying to move a goalpost.
Tourettes is not always a disabling condition and since I saw the movie I could see woth my.own eyes he was not disabled.
You just have a horrible liberal mindset of not taking responsibility.
You'll never convince me he was disabled because he never ever demonstrated it in the movie.
Take the L and stop assuming shit that wasn't in the movie retard.
You sound like you are still a child woth zero critical thinking. Also with pathetic world views.