I wonder what the justification was. With Yuzu I know there was that issue with some versions being behind a paywall, but I don't think that was the case with Ryujinx.
Maybe Nintendont should get out of hardware sales altogether and focus on their bread and butter, fleecing children's piggy banks (e.g. Dad's credit card) with re-re-releases of existing game titles and selling $0.25 amiibos for $30 that serve basically no purpose outside of unique or even generic loot box drops.
I still love Zelda and some Mario titles, but I haven't given those excessively litigious fucks a dime in over a decade since they started going after Rom sites; and I will continue not doing so regardless of future consoles getting successfully emulated or not.
I wonder what the justification was. With Yuzu I know there was that issue with some versions being behind a paywall, but I don't think that was the case with Ryujinx.
Yuzu played with fire when they put an anti-piracy fix for Tears of the Kingdom behind a paywall weeks before the game was officially released.
Maybe Nintendont should get out of hardware sales altogether and focus on their bread and butter, fleecing children's piggy banks (e.g. Dad's credit card) with re-re-releases of existing game titles and selling $0.25 amiibos for $30 that serve basically no purpose outside of unique or even generic loot box drops.
I still love Zelda and some Mario titles, but I haven't given those excessively litigious fucks a dime in over a decade since they started going after Rom sites; and I will continue not doing so regardless of future consoles getting successfully emulated or not.