White populations are being displaced by Mass Migration. Mass Deportations fix that.
That's a start, but not a fix.
The white populations are pretty much static, except for Leftist Whites which are in decline because they keep killing themselves with nihilism and abortions.
As someone else already said, that's still an attack, that's still a decline, too. You want to say white identity is anathema to white people...firstly, I don't agree but, secondly, radical leftism used to be anathema to white people, in a big way. The very fact that we have tons of white leftists is itself a sign of decay.
You might not like that American isn't innately White...
I honestly wouldn't care, if the powers that be weren't actively trying to get rid of white people. We never should have had as many nonwhites shoved into this country but, no, I don't need an exclusively or innately white America. But now, all modern demographic trickery is an attack on whites, it seems.
...but that's because it's a Liberal Revolutionary country. Americans are both Civic National, and assimilatory, not exclusively White.
That's, uh, that's not exactly how any of that works. Going from +90% to ~60% white was not some natural, 'liberal civic nationalism,' it was an outright attack. Which is why it happened so quickly. There is nothing organic about it, so it's a joke to try to say it's because we're innately a "Liberal Revolutionary" country. Mass migration went against the entire country's history up to that point, and it went against the wishes of the people, too. No one signed up for this.
Yes we were 90% white around that time, I'll say it again, what makes you think a group of whites can't accomplish things?
But you were talking about state power. You were talking about state versus stateless people. A very, very predominately white state landed on the moon. Not just some random assortment of white people. Only reason I brought it up is because you were talking about the state.
Also, a group of whites will be harder pressed than ever to accomplish things, because the very concept of "a group of whites" is, in the current framework, deemed incredibly racist. As we've talked about. We're not allowed to be "a group of whites," which causes some serious problems.
Again, you are explicitly refusing to listen to my responses, and substituting them with what you think I'm really saying.
You want to say white identity is anathema to white people...firstly, I don't agree but, secondly, radical leftism used to be anathema to white people, in a big way.
Absolutely not even remotely close. Leftism is emergent form a psychotic bastardization of Liberalism which is an explicitly western european invention. Leftism usurped Liberalism and dominates European societies, and has always found favor among European populations.
That's, uh, that's not exactly how any of that works. Going from +90% to ~60% white was not some natural, 'liberal civic nationalism,'
Your complaining about the Hart-Cellar Act, when the founding of the country as a Liberal state doesn't change what the cultural values of the population still remain. If anything, your complaining about the American Liberal values that the Hart-Cellar Act appealed to.
No, I'm saying your arguments are wrong.
No, you're not. You're saying the arguments your making for me are wrong. You've repeatedly made up new arguments from things I didn't say, and condemned me for saying things that you made up.
Yes, they are.
That's a start, but not a fix.
As someone else already said, that's still an attack, that's still a decline, too. You want to say white identity is anathema to white people...firstly, I don't agree but, secondly, radical leftism used to be anathema to white people, in a big way. The very fact that we have tons of white leftists is itself a sign of decay.
I honestly wouldn't care, if the powers that be weren't actively trying to get rid of white people. We never should have had as many nonwhites shoved into this country but, no, I don't need an exclusively or innately white America. But now, all modern demographic trickery is an attack on whites, it seems.
That's, uh, that's not exactly how any of that works. Going from +90% to ~60% white was not some natural, 'liberal civic nationalism,' it was an outright attack. Which is why it happened so quickly. There is nothing organic about it, so it's a joke to try to say it's because we're innately a "Liberal Revolutionary" country. Mass migration went against the entire country's history up to that point, and it went against the wishes of the people, too. No one signed up for this.
But you were talking about state power. You were talking about state versus stateless people. A very, very predominately white state landed on the moon. Not just some random assortment of white people. Only reason I brought it up is because you were talking about the state.
Also, a group of whites will be harder pressed than ever to accomplish things, because the very concept of "a group of whites" is, in the current framework, deemed incredibly racist. As we've talked about. We're not allowed to be "a group of whites," which causes some serious problems.
No, I'm saying your arguments are wrong.
Absolutely not even remotely close. Leftism is emergent form a psychotic bastardization of Liberalism which is an explicitly western european invention. Leftism usurped Liberalism and dominates European societies, and has always found favor among European populations.
Your complaining about the Hart-Cellar Act, when the founding of the country as a Liberal state doesn't change what the cultural values of the population still remain. If anything, your complaining about the American Liberal values that the Hart-Cellar Act appealed to.
No, you're not. You're saying the arguments your making for me are wrong. You've repeatedly made up new arguments from things I didn't say, and condemned me for saying things that you made up.