Women ruined Scientific American
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
Used to enjoy this magazine along with Nat Geo. I remember scratching my head and wondering how these articles are considered science. Like them commenting on Floyd riots
National Geographic is wholesale proglodyte propaganda. Soft science, like the 'Sci-Fi Channel' turning into the 'Syfy Channel'.They should call it 'Natty Geographs' or something.
Near and dear to my heart. I was 10 going on 11 when sci-fi channel debuted. It was originally intended to appeal to nerds/sci-fi fans. That isn’t their mission anymore
Idk, I was rewatching eureka and damn is there a lot of political cringe, boss mommy fantasies, and just low iq drivel. There’s still some good moments and fun, but is did not age well at all.
I didn’t mind it but I watched it when it came out before I got sick of “the message” and the usual stuff we see all over. 90s sci-fi channel was great. I learned about a lot of classic shows like Night Gallery, Dark Shadows, Starman, 80s TZ, original Outer Limits, and more. One of my favorite shows was a Saturday morning show where they would interview classic sci fi authors