It's the easiest thing in the world to test. Just choose any city in the US and have them not vaccinate half the kids for a few years. They'd get instant definitive results.
Which is kind of telling that they've never done this in any vaccine rollout. It's always national given to everyone, with no staggered rollout. That's because they know the answer, and they don't want other people to know.
The argument against this is that vaccines are so save and effective, it would be unethical to not shoot someone up as soon as possible. It's kinda sad that that's the best argument they could come up with.
we already have ''control groups'' that don't vaccinate their kids, and their kids catch these childhood diseases they aren't vaccinated against, and they are still overall healthier than vaccinated kids.
So that argument against setting up a study with a control group is a dishonest one.
It's the easiest thing in the world to test. Just choose any city in the US and have them not vaccinate half the kids for a few years. They'd get instant definitive results.
Which is kind of telling that they've never done this in any vaccine rollout. It's always national given to everyone, with no staggered rollout. That's because they know the answer, and they don't want other people to know.
The argument against this is that vaccines are so save and effective, it would be unethical to not shoot someone up as soon as possible. It's kinda sad that that's the best argument they could come up with.
we already have ''control groups'' that don't vaccinate their kids, and their kids catch these childhood diseases they aren't vaccinated against, and they are still overall healthier than vaccinated kids.
So that argument against setting up a study with a control group is a dishonest one.