I wish more people would do this. When you're interrupting the person you're interviewing and arguing with them, you're making yourself part of the story, which is a No-No for journalism regardless of what your political beliefs are.
Pointing at the double standard is valid, but the call should be to get them to shut the fuck up no matter who they're asking questions to. I wish normies would understand the obvious truth that if only one side of the political spectrum is getting this treatment, the reporter isn't neutral.
They're defending from criticism from their viewers that they let Vance speak what they perceive as lies without being challenged with talking points. That's criticism they take to heart. Not what we say. So I don't think they'll stop.
This is the big deal. There is effectively no mechanism for us to even interact with CNN viewers because we are outside of their echo-chamber, their media ecosphere, their overton window, and their entire moral universe. (Hence why we are deontologically evil and our children deserve to be raped and murdered in front of us)
As such, Vance going onto their ground and holding them to their standards is an Alinskyite tactic.
If Democrats' monetary base was made up who they imply, they wouldn't have any money. Back in the day, it seemed like business was a column against leftism. When Exxon-mobil was the largest company in the world. In the days when it was Apple, I don't think coincidentally, big business fell in with the media, and the bureaucrats, and the dependent class. My point is I think we're outside the world right now. Every bit of power that clings to relevancy seems set against us. But it's like losing a mutiny on a sinking ship.
Big business has never been against the political Left. They have, at most, been anti-Communist and Pro-Socialist. This is because big business hits an upper limit to their growth that requires government subsidy and regulation to protect them from competition. This is especially important as they get to the Oligarchy stage of hierarchy, which means they can't really exist independent of government power, and become an agent of government power.
However, it is as you say, these are acts of complete desperation. They aren't actually in control. No one is flying the plane and they are in a death spiral.
The danger is that the lion is most dangerous as he is dying and wounded.
I wish more people would do this. When you're interrupting the person you're interviewing and arguing with them, you're making yourself part of the story, which is a No-No for journalism regardless of what your political beliefs are.
Pointing at the double standard is valid, but the call should be to get them to shut the fuck up no matter who they're asking questions to. I wish normies would understand the obvious truth that if only one side of the political spectrum is getting this treatment, the reporter isn't neutral.
They're defending from criticism from their viewers that they let Vance speak what they perceive as lies without being challenged with talking points. That's criticism they take to heart. Not what we say. So I don't think they'll stop.
This is the big deal. There is effectively no mechanism for us to even interact with CNN viewers because we are outside of their echo-chamber, their media ecosphere, their overton window, and their entire moral universe. (Hence why we are deontologically evil and our children deserve to be raped and murdered in front of us)
As such, Vance going onto their ground and holding them to their standards is an Alinskyite tactic.
If Democrats' monetary base was made up who they imply, they wouldn't have any money. Back in the day, it seemed like business was a column against leftism. When Exxon-mobil was the largest company in the world. In the days when it was Apple, I don't think coincidentally, big business fell in with the media, and the bureaucrats, and the dependent class. My point is I think we're outside the world right now. Every bit of power that clings to relevancy seems set against us. But it's like losing a mutiny on a sinking ship.
Big business has never been against the political Left. They have, at most, been anti-Communist and Pro-Socialist. This is because big business hits an upper limit to their growth that requires government subsidy and regulation to protect them from competition. This is especially important as they get to the Oligarchy stage of hierarchy, which means they can't really exist independent of government power, and become an agent of government power.
However, it is as you say, these are acts of complete desperation. They aren't actually in control. No one is flying the plane and they are in a death spiral.
The danger is that the lion is most dangerous as he is dying and wounded.