and now we are having debates on whether to take them in or not? lmao
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (61)
sorted by:
No, the slave rebellion and a liberal revolution tend to go hand in hand. Liberalism is antithetical to slavery and vice versa. This is why there were whites that were spared for working with the revolutionaries. And yes, the war had been going on for some time, and there were whites on the side of the revolutionaries.
They got caught off-guard by the genocide, which is why you shouldn't trust Leftists.
Nobody was caught off guard. This is like all Republican Californians getting slaughtered in LA country in 2040 a decade into the new civil war. You have to leave when the writing is on the wall.
Second the former slaves got wind that they would have slavery imposed on them if France (ie Whites) got into power again. Who was going to enforce it once the army left?
Your conflating things, again. Why would the white liberals impose slavery when they are fighting against slavery and colonialism?
Just because you want it to be a race war from start to finish doesn't mean it is.
You’re trying to switch your position now. It was a race war from the start because the Haitian Revolution was the direct result of the slave revolt of 1791.
White liberals as you call them were never in charge of the revolt and racial tension have always been present on the island. Every White person knew what was in store for them if the revolt succeeded or failed.
I haven't changed my position. I'm saying it's not a race war. Anti-Slavery whites exist. Get over it.