I mean, the red army's misdeeds are a well known fact. The Russians absolutely raped their way to Berlin.
As for the Japanese, well "ero-guro" manga/eroge are not always just the figment of the imagination of the artist, if I can put it that way...
The problem since then is that bizarre 'human rights' chauvinism spiral western countries have been stuck in, but the rest of the world fundamentally did not change, this is why they laugh at us, our stupid laws and our stupid women.
I wouldn't say it's weird to have 'human rights' in war, makes the Canadians more inventive...
But basically having more rules so your soldiers aren't going round raping like they're 'South Asians in England' is an advantage at times. There is a reason Germany was fighting tooth and nail on the Eastern front as they were giving as much time to get civilians through to the Western side.
I'd say the problem is not utilising the stick enough, why go round raping some village like animals when you can erase the village from the map for attacking your forces.
In my last paragraph, I'm not talking about back then during WWII though, I'm talking about today. The rest of the world has fundamentally not changed.
AFAIK for US soldiers, rape was ground for being court martialed during WWII already, which wasn't a bad thing.
That part I agree on, treat animals as animals, humans as humans.
If you have a group of mammals going round, aggressively attacking people and even killing and raping, why are you applying human rights? Should be an animal control issue.
While the 1907 Hague Convention (IV) on Land Warfare made war rape a war crime in international armed conflicts, the judges at the Nuremberg trials in 1946 stated "the laws and customs of war apply between belligerents, but not...among allies."[14] Such statement was reinforced by the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention under Article 4, which excludes allied nationals from the list of protected persons as long their state maintains diplomatic relations with a belligerent power.[15] At the time of Marocchinate, Italy was a co-belligerent with the Allies, having declared war on its former Axis partner Nazi Germany on 13 October 1943.[16]
As a result, the war rape of Italian women in Italy by French colonial troops fell under the purview of both French military and Italian civilian law instead of international humanitarian law.
They executed the spooks, but sending the spooks in at the first place was the point, they didn't execute they leaders. This is how they treat those who turned against the axis, useful goys to satisfy a primal urge to devastate the shared psyche of Whites. Europeans, Christians, sane citizens of the world should be aware that submitting to they's will is just 'a little bit of rape' and 'only a few children groomed for sacrifice'. Any submission to the Beast is complete submission, stupid and traitorous.
So the British had for their foreign forces the Geneva checklist Canadians, crazy Australians and 'doom slayer' Gurkhas
The Germans had the Italians which were not as effective..
Soviets just had ENDLESS bodies to throw
The Americans had a industrial war machine
The Japanese had EXTREME cruelty and Suicidal loyalty
And the French had African rape gangs
...there is a reason the British has a commonwealth and the French former colonies have ALL been the problem children..
I mean, the red army's misdeeds are a well known fact. The Russians absolutely raped their way to Berlin.
As for the Japanese, well "ero-guro" manga/eroge are not always just the figment of the imagination of the artist, if I can put it that way...
The problem since then is that bizarre 'human rights' chauvinism spiral western countries have been stuck in, but the rest of the world fundamentally did not change, this is why they laugh at us, our stupid laws and our stupid women.
I wouldn't say it's weird to have 'human rights' in war, makes the Canadians more inventive...
But basically having more rules so your soldiers aren't going round raping like they're 'South Asians in England' is an advantage at times. There is a reason Germany was fighting tooth and nail on the Eastern front as they were giving as much time to get civilians through to the Western side.
I'd say the problem is not utilising the stick enough, why go round raping some village like animals when you can erase the village from the map for attacking your forces.
In my last paragraph, I'm not talking about back then during WWII though, I'm talking about today. The rest of the world has fundamentally not changed.
AFAIK for US soldiers, rape was ground for being court martialed during WWII already, which wasn't a bad thing.
That part I agree on, treat animals as animals, humans as humans.
If you have a group of mammals going round, aggressively attacking people and even killing and raping, why are you applying human rights? Should be an animal control issue.
Hans, are we the baddies?
Hans wasn't.
They executed the spooks, but sending the spooks in at the first place was the point, they didn't execute they leaders. This is how they treat those who turned against the axis, useful goys to satisfy a primal urge to devastate the shared psyche of Whites. Europeans, Christians, sane citizens of the world should be aware that submitting to they's will is just 'a little bit of rape' and 'only a few children groomed for sacrifice'. Any submission to the Beast is complete submission, stupid and traitorous.