A few people had mentioned that 'Twisters' didn't invoke climate change, so I thought cool -- a few special effects and a fun few hours.
Then it starts -- two white chicks and three pajeets! And... there are, actually, some astonishingly good-looking pajeets, but they chose the weak-chinned losers, of course.
I lasted about five minutes.
I wish we could put pajeets, chicks and (the rule-16 people) on an island, and see what they'd create.
We all know that they'd do nothing but argue.
But hey, Madame Curie was, like, super good at putting samples into a machine that she didn't build.
Sorry, just ranting.
Then how did you know he was talking about jews?
Edit: since I don't want to wait for a week for you to log in again to reply, I will just answer my own question. You knew because everyone here, including you, knows that the way the rule is written and the way it is enforced are two very different things. I'm glad my use of "rule16" as a euphemism is catching on. I knew it would drive you nuts.
I wonder if I can say "Gas the rule16's", or if DoM will delete this post?
Being that he is a weasel, I would bet his reason for removing it would be for rule 2.
Yeah, because it would be a Rule 2 violation anyway. (ModsAreAIDS was correct. I'm not a weasel though. I'm clearly a dragon. rawr.)
I can also reasonably guess which group is being meant based on context clues. Nobody goes around screaming 'gas the hindi'.
Strictly speaking, I think the Hindus are gassing us.
Just post it. Dont be scared.
Because you are obsessed with jews. It's really quite easy. You insist on using euphemisms when, for the past 5 years, no one in KiA has removed comments based on euphemism. It's the only group you would use a euphemism for in the first place. If he meant black, he would have just said "nog" or some variant.
You assumed he was talking about jews because I "am obsessed with them"? I'm sure that sounded great in your head.
You're collectivists, I treat you as a collective.
Dom uses projection.
It's not very effective.