A few people had mentioned that 'Twisters' didn't invoke climate change, so I thought cool -- a few special effects and a fun few hours.
Then it starts -- two white chicks and three pajeets! And... there are, actually, some astonishingly good-looking pajeets, but they chose the weak-chinned losers, of course.
I lasted about five minutes.
I wish we could put pajeets, chicks and (the rule-16 people) on an island, and see what they'd create.
We all know that they'd do nothing but argue.
But hey, Madame Curie was, like, super good at putting samples into a machine that she didn't build.
Sorry, just ranting.
Spoiler, those people die in the prologue, except for one, plus the main chick.
The island thing already happened in Survivor, when they had two groups on two islands, one with all chicks. They sucked at everything.
The ''expert survivalist'' women getting lost walking circles on a tiny island or crying because they saw a snake,
the show.
But wait, there's more!
The producers cheated to help the women, and they still almost died. The producers secretly gave the women a few pigs for food, and the women refused to butcher and eat them, instead opting to keep them as pets...while they starved. If I remember correctly, the producers also gave the women large quantities of fresh water, to prevent them from dying due to dehydration. Then, in a last ditched effort at "equality", the producers stole two of the men and put them on the women's island, and put two of the women on the men's island.
The men who arrived on the women's island were in awe with how bad their situation was, with how the women had been doing nothing to improve their lot the entire time, and had eaten all of their backup rations. Those two men did pretty much all the work while the women bitched and laid around. The two women sent to the men's island did the same, enjoying the labors of the men.
In a "natural" setting, those women wouldn't be doing nothing. They would be caring for babies and young children. If society advanced enough, cleaning, cooking, making clothes and helping with farming.
We can't have a normal functional repartition of labour under feminism. That would be "misoginy".
The women would also be slaughtering/butchering the pigs in a natural setting.
Women are capable of lots of things if they're guided by the patriarchy.
Without the patriarchy... well, they just try to show off their asses and complain.