All choices are bad in this election. Trump and the quisling GOP may be slightly less bad in that while they're still going to take orders from the DNC they'll implement them a bit slower.
These days I'm a bit of an accelerationist, though. The faster we hit rock bottom the sooner we can start rebuilding.
You're an "accelerationist" who talks about how he's going to escape to Argentina. That's not rebuilding. You don't get to say "one of us" when someone expresses a desire to actually stick around to fix things.
I'd much rather help the Argentinians succeed because they actually seem to give a shit about things like basic economics whereas a lot of the Europeans don't. I have hope for the Americans, but for them it's going to be an uphill battle because there are plenty of TDS sufferers and white guilt going around in that country.
What exactly is the point in offering real solutions to the problems people face who will openly hate you for it exactly? I live on TERF island as well for fuck's sake if that wasn't enough. You don't understand because you likely live in a somewhat stable country, in Britain it is reality now that if you dare to suggest mass importing foreign criminals is a bad idea you'll get arrested for it and the population will cheer it on.
Oh, I agree that you live in a shittier place than I do. My point is that the other guy—and the accelerationist philosophy in general—is saying "collapse is inevitable, but if it happens soon, [my group] has a chance to survive the worst and rebuild with people that aren't retards, because all the retards will have died or been driven out in the extreme civil unrest that follows collapse." When someone says "I'm an accelerationist because the sooner we hit rock bottom, the sooner we can rebuild," the implication is that he expects to be literally fighting and killing and starving in order to get that chance to rebuild.
Then you come along and say "yeah, I'm gonna sit out all those horrors in a nation that isn't collapsing. I totally support pulling it all down on my way out the door, though. We're exactly the same."
Heads they win. Tails we lose.
All choices are bad in this election. Trump and the quisling GOP may be slightly less bad in that while they're still going to take orders from the DNC they'll implement them a bit slower.
These days I'm a bit of an accelerationist, though. The faster we hit rock bottom the sooner we can start rebuilding.
How many examples can you point to where that worked out well for people who want what we want?
The United States (ironically) is one.
Any others?
Never know until you know
Doesn't seem like a great strategy tbh, especially with the advancement of propaganda techniques at their disposal compared to historical comparisons.
One of us, one of us
You're an "accelerationist" who talks about how he's going to escape to Argentina. That's not rebuilding. You don't get to say "one of us" when someone expresses a desire to actually stick around to fix things.
I'd much rather help the Argentinians succeed because they actually seem to give a shit about things like basic economics whereas a lot of the Europeans don't. I have hope for the Americans, but for them it's going to be an uphill battle because there are plenty of TDS sufferers and white guilt going around in that country.
What exactly is the point in offering real solutions to the problems people face who will openly hate you for it exactly? I live on TERF island as well for fuck's sake if that wasn't enough. You don't understand because you likely live in a somewhat stable country, in Britain it is reality now that if you dare to suggest mass importing foreign criminals is a bad idea you'll get arrested for it and the population will cheer it on.
Oh, I agree that you live in a shittier place than I do. My point is that the other guy—and the accelerationist philosophy in general—is saying "collapse is inevitable, but if it happens soon, [my group] has a chance to survive the worst and rebuild with people that aren't retards, because all the retards will have died or been driven out in the extreme civil unrest that follows collapse." When someone says "I'm an accelerationist because the sooner we hit rock bottom, the sooner we can rebuild," the implication is that he expects to be literally fighting and killing and starving in order to get that chance to rebuild.
Then you come along and say "yeah, I'm gonna sit out all those horrors in a nation that isn't collapsing. I totally support pulling it all down on my way out the door, though. We're exactly the same."
It's insulting.