Sweetheart, I'm not arguing with someone who doesn't even know a thing about LGBTQ+ people. I'm not fighting with someone who's not only brainwashed, but delusional and unwillingly to accept change or differences. You're not special, and I've faced people like you before. I’ve been debating the “anti-SJW” crowd for six years now. In all those years, there has never been a single reactionary I’ve debated that has had a strong, rational, and or fact-based argument against LGBTQ+ topics. They all resorted to five things:
A Denial of Reality (ex. I’ve had reactionaries tell me before that “Science, history, and math are made up by the government to control us” and “I don’t believe in scientists or doctors because they’ve been corrupted by the woke agenda”... right before they began recommending me the works of Richard Dawkins, a BIOLOGIST (a type of scientist). These were real comments given to me by people who claim to like “the truth”. They don't like reality. They only like people who agree with them.)
Name-calling / False Accusations (ex. Neo-Nazis calling me bigoted, pedophiles calling me a child groomer, accusations about me being liberal, a Jew, a Marxist, etc. and other untrue things about me.)
Strawmen and Stereotyping (ex. Making-up wildly unjust and unfair caricatures of opponents to make their own irrational points look sane by comparison, only making themselves look more foolish.)
Gaslighting (ex. Saying that what happened never happened and accusing their opponents of doing what they are doing. Going “I/They never said that!”, “I didn’t mean it!”, “That’s not what they meant!”, “Actually, YOU’RE doing this!”, etc.)
Threats and cyberbullying (ex. Threats of violence, murder, rape, shootings, doxxing etc.)
If you have a real argument that doesn’t resort to these five methods, come at me. But because your homophobia and transphobia are worthless, irrational, and idiotic ideologies, no justification for them is possible without resorting to various logical fallacies. And no, your angry feelings and personal prejudice against people who are different from you don't count as real arguments.
That is some immense projection and gaslighting there. You just keep circling back to that, your conditioning has you acting more like an automaton than complete person.
The perhaps the reason you seem to think that everyone resorts to insults after they start talking to you, is that you're so deep in denial of how debased your behavior is that accurately labeling your acts feels insulting. It would be insulting if it weren't true, but it is true and that only makes it shameful. Stop being a disappointment to everyone, doubling down on doing more harm rather than admit fault is not a virtue.
Sweetheart, I'm not arguing with someone who doesn't even know a thing about LGBTQ+ people. I'm not fighting with someone who's not only brainwashed, but delusional and unwillingly to accept change or differences. You're not special, and I've faced people like you before. I’ve been debating the “anti-SJW” crowd for six years now. In all those years, there has never been a single reactionary I’ve debated that has had a strong, rational, and or fact-based argument against LGBTQ+ topics. They all resorted to five things:
A Denial of Reality (ex. I’ve had reactionaries tell me before that “Science, history, and math are made up by the government to control us” and “I don’t believe in scientists or doctors because they’ve been corrupted by the woke agenda”... right before they began recommending me the works of Richard Dawkins, a BIOLOGIST (a type of scientist). These were real comments given to me by people who claim to like “the truth”. They don't like reality. They only like people who agree with them.)
Name-calling / False Accusations (ex. Neo-Nazis calling me bigoted, pedophiles calling me a child groomer, accusations about me being liberal, a Jew, a Marxist, etc. and other untrue things about me.)
Strawmen and Stereotyping (ex. Making-up wildly unjust and unfair caricatures of opponents to make their own irrational points look sane by comparison, only making themselves look more foolish.)
Gaslighting (ex. Saying that what happened never happened and accusing their opponents of doing what they are doing. Going “I/They never said that!”, “I didn’t mean it!”, “That’s not what they meant!”, “Actually, YOU’RE doing this!”, etc.)
Threats and cyberbullying (ex. Threats of violence, murder, rape, shootings, doxxing etc.)
If you have a real argument that doesn’t resort to these five methods, come at me. But because your homophobia and transphobia are worthless, irrational, and idiotic ideologies, no justification for them is possible without resorting to various logical fallacies. And no, your angry feelings and personal prejudice against people who are different from you don't count as real arguments.
That is some immense projection and gaslighting there. You just keep circling back to that, your conditioning has you acting more like an automaton than complete person.
The perhaps the reason you seem to think that everyone resorts to insults after they start talking to you, is that you're so deep in denial of how debased your behavior is that accurately labeling your acts feels insulting. It would be insulting if it weren't true, but it is true and that only makes it shameful. Stop being a disappointment to everyone, doubling down on doing more harm rather than admit fault is not a virtue.