'White supremacy' does not mean 'the belief that white people are superior', as it is incorrectly used 99.9% of the time. It is the belief that white people should be politically supreme.
But as for the former sense? These stupid bitches do believe they're better than anyone else, even though they're better than exactly no one.
Why shouldn’t white peoples be politically supreme in democratic nations where whites are the majority?
Your idiotic definition of white supremacy leads to the following:
Majority white nations in which enfranchised white peoples are permitted to harbor healthy in-group biases are de facto white supremacies
Therefore whites must be stripped of one or more of the following in order to prevent white supremacy: their healthy in-group biases, their nations, their franchise
The destruction of white peoples, nations, and cultures is implicit in your retarded redefinition. Fuck you.
Your idiotic definition of white supremacy leads to the following:
It's not a redefinition. It's the original definition, back when "white people are better" was taken for granted. Abraham Lincoln was a white supremacist in both senses.
Until there were so few people who argued an actual white supremacist position like "blacks should not be able to vote" that there was little point in letting a perfectly good slur go to waste.
Majority white nations in which enfranchised white peoples are permitted to harbor healthy in-group biases are de facto white supremacies
A better example is South Africa before the fall of what is incorrectly labeled as the Apartheid government. Apartheid was dismantled in the late 1970s, but it was white supremacist until the end. While there are legitimate criticisms of the white supremacist government (which people here deny), it seems that with its fall South Africa is moving towards becoming yet another failed state. Not the 'bacon of hope' as Germany's Foreign Minister memorably called it.
The destruction of white peoples, nations, and cultures is implicit in your retarded redefinition. Fuck you.
"Almost no one labeled as a 'white supremacist' is actually one" = "you want to destroy white people". OK.
“Almost no one labeled as a 'white supremacist' is actually one" = "you want to destroy white people". OK.
I perfectly explained how your definition of white supremacy necessarily designates all white peoples as white supremacists if they meet the following three conditions:
Whites are the majority of the country’s population
They have healthy in-group bias
The country is a democracy
These three conditions combined necessitate political supremacy for the majority demographic. These conditions can only be removed by actions that also necessarily destroy the people.
Mass immigration creating demographic replacement to the point where whites are no longer the majority.
Erosion of in-group biases leading to culturally suicidal dysgenic behaviors as well as being outcompeted by other demos.
Literal disenfranchisement.
So by your definition of white supremacy, whites are either white supremacists or oppressed by other demos or being demographically replaced.
I’m starting to think you’re just low IQ. You present an idea, and then you don’t have the capacity to reason out the inevitable consequences of that idea.
If only
'White supremacy' does not mean 'the belief that white people are superior', as it is incorrectly used 99.9% of the time. It is the belief that white people should be politically supreme.
But as for the former sense? These stupid bitches do believe they're better than anyone else, even though they're better than exactly no one.
Why shouldn’t white peoples be politically supreme in democratic nations where whites are the majority?
Your idiotic definition of white supremacy leads to the following:
Majority white nations in which enfranchised white peoples are permitted to harbor healthy in-group biases are de facto white supremacies
Therefore whites must be stripped of one or more of the following in order to prevent white supremacy: their healthy in-group biases, their nations, their franchise
The destruction of white peoples, nations, and cultures is implicit in your retarded redefinition. Fuck you.
It's not a redefinition. It's the original definition, back when "white people are better" was taken for granted. Abraham Lincoln was a white supremacist in both senses.
Until there were so few people who argued an actual white supremacist position like "blacks should not be able to vote" that there was little point in letting a perfectly good slur go to waste.
A better example is South Africa before the fall of what is incorrectly labeled as the Apartheid government. Apartheid was dismantled in the late 1970s, but it was white supremacist until the end. While there are legitimate criticisms of the white supremacist government (which people here deny), it seems that with its fall South Africa is moving towards becoming yet another failed state. Not the 'bacon of hope' as Germany's Foreign Minister memorably called it.
"Almost no one labeled as a 'white supremacist' is actually one" = "you want to destroy white people". OK.
I perfectly explained how your definition of white supremacy necessarily designates all white peoples as white supremacists if they meet the following three conditions:
Whites are the majority of the country’s population
They have healthy in-group bias
The country is a democracy
These three conditions combined necessitate political supremacy for the majority demographic. These conditions can only be removed by actions that also necessarily destroy the people.
Mass immigration creating demographic replacement to the point where whites are no longer the majority.
Erosion of in-group biases leading to culturally suicidal dysgenic behaviors as well as being outcompeted by other demos.
Literal disenfranchisement.
So by your definition of white supremacy, whites are either white supremacists or oppressed by other demos or being demographically replaced.
I’m starting to think you’re just low IQ. You present an idea, and then you don’t have the capacity to reason out the inevitable consequences of that idea.