The answer to the last guy's question is pretty obvious and shows how retarded he is to even ask it.
Its because liberals aren't people, they lack shame and the ability to engage in reasonable arguments. If they had those traits they have been overton window'd out a while ago now. So arguing with them is a literal waste of time because they cannot respect anything that isn't their worldview.
Have Christians demanded that the director be fired from any job that he has ? Have Christians considered demanding that politicians bring back blasphemy laws ? i haven't seen Christians even try to suggest this. That's why i say Christians have no teeth and instead engage in "why didn't you do that to some other religion" . Which is pathetic.
Most of this is a theological argument that's fine. The issue is the sentence regarding the idea that modern jews called for Jesus' death. There actually is a problem with that asserting that all modern jews want Jesus either tacitly or directly to be killed. It's an intertermporal moral claim. The forward application of guilt through time violates the rule, also the breadth of the claim (clearly not all jews wanted Jesus dead in his time, which is why he had followers).
The answer to the last guy's question is pretty obvious and shows how retarded he is to even ask it.
Its because liberals aren't people, they lack shame and the ability to engage in reasonable arguments. If they had those traits they have been overton window'd out a while ago now. So arguing with them is a literal waste of time because they cannot respect anything that isn't their worldview.
Have Christians demanded that the director be fired from any job that he has ? Have Christians considered demanding that politicians bring back blasphemy laws ? i haven't seen Christians even try to suggest this. That's why i say Christians have no teeth and instead engage in "why didn't you do that to some other religion" . Which is pathetic.
Most cultural "Christians" are judeo-christians.
There is the body of christ, those who follow him, and then there is the Judeo-Christians who go to buildings to talk about being "good".
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Most of this is a theological argument that's fine. The issue is the sentence regarding the idea that modern jews called for Jesus' death. There actually is a problem with that asserting that all modern jews want Jesus either tacitly or directly to be killed. It's an intertermporal moral claim. The forward application of guilt through time violates the rule, also the breadth of the claim (clearly not all jews wanted Jesus dead in his time, which is why he had followers).