"Amid Transphobic Attacks"
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
You know, if we didn't hear it was transphobic to demand repercussions for a tranny grooming minors, we wouldn't think trans was linked to pedophilia.
Like when was the last time you heard attacking some White pedo was racism towards White people? You're inferring it's a feature not a bug that trans have a higher chance of messing with kids..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2002/06/29/pedophilia-and-homosexuality/b385cfb3-8b58-449d-8af9-0cfdcd278978/
-- Timothy J. Dailey
Bust those facts out the next time a groomer gets uppity
Because we (the west) don't incarcerate female sex offenders. Not saying that the numbers are equal, but you can't determine offense rates from incarceration rates.
The rest of the data seems to be reasonable (at least on the same order of magnitude) but that particular stat stood out to me as a bit dishonest.
I remember imp gave me shit about that last time I posted it lol. Fair point (Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics) but can you think of a better stat to use in its place? I think it’s probably on the correct order of magnitude, do you think there’s an order of magnitude more female perps who are getting swept under the rug than not? Or how does that work
I'd suggest that out of 3000 people that have engaged in criminal sexual conduct with a minor, it's closer to 120 than 12 (and possibly closer to 1200) that are female. And they don't even have to sweep female perps under the rug for that statistic, just punish them less severely than male perps (since the quoted statistic is based on incarcerations and not offense rates.)
As for a better statistic to use, I'd start off with convicted offenders and see how that compares.