You remember when Time tweeted out how the the-photo-that-shall-no-longer-be-named would (obviously) the cover photo for the next issue? You also know how you saw a story the other day how an unnamed AP editor was going around telling other journalists how they needed to downplay that photo, because it make Trump look to good?
What a surprise, right? They take something that is obviously a positive look for Trump, and change the cover into something that turns his rally into a dark grey disaster, with the flag presiding overhead - over Trump's "destruction of democracy".
Again - you might think you hate these people enough, but you still don't.
They'd sell far more magazines if that iconic image is on the frontpage.
Clearly, they have other priorities.
Just one. The same as always - keep their party in power.
Look at all the companies that pulled their ads from Tucker Carlson's show on Fox News despite his show being the highest rated news show by far. MSNBC had car commercials while he got PC Matic and Rosland Capital.
Magazines?
Ideologues don't care about making money, they care about spreading the message kekw