It's not useless for me though. The purpose is to show people that nearly all women in modernity are feminists. If I wanted to specify something else, I'd say something like "radical feminist" which might only be 60% of women.
And I agree with this assessment. Women all eat from the ill-gotten gains of feminism so they can also be weighed with the sins of them too.
I simply think studies like that are retarded, self-reporting ones even more so, and with women already being retarded it makes extrapolating anything from it useless anyway.
When in reality, as already mentioned, they eat from feminist's treasury so they all are one regardless of what they think.
Self-Reported studies are absolutely stupid in all regards. Would you ask a group of monkeys how intelligent they thought they were on a scale of 0-100 then ask a group of humans how intelligent they thought they were on a scale of 0-100 and then report that whoever answered the highest was in fact the most intelligent? Uhhhhhh, what?
Asking women what they think about anything just confirms how women think about something which doesn't necessarily (and most likely) have anything to do with what you're trying to measure.
Agree entirely. Especially as women are hugely impacted by social pressures, so their self reports are almost entirely "what does this person want me to say" or "what will make me sound better" instead of a reflection of themselves.
You can gauge stuff about them from what they think makes them sound better, like saying they are feminist because they think it means good, but a direct 1:1 dataset is absolute retardation.
Okay, but what are you going to do with that? Are you agreeing with Imp, women need to be collectively put through a Nuremberg trial? Are you going MGTOW? Or is it just an observation that gee, a lot of people hold feminist beliefs? Because again, if we’re being honest, the majority of western men are probably also feminists under this definition.
Would you put a cat through a Nuremberg trial? Most women aren't self aware enough for it to matter.
I agree that most men and women are feminist. It doesn't matter for now because nothing will change; however, as society continues to crumble until it finally reached a tipping point, the feminists (both men and women) will be rounded up and killed or forced to change their beliefs because feminism will destroy civilization. That may sound crazy now but it won't be in another century. There's nothing new under the sun and there's a reason no feminist society has survived long or was ever written about how great their accomplishments were. Feminism is not a sustainable belief system, is dysgenic and leads to a society imploding. Men will realize this eventually and make the needed correction, though not until things get really bad which they will soon enough.
It's not useless for me though. The purpose is to show people that nearly all women in modernity are feminists. If I wanted to specify something else, I'd say something like "radical feminist" which might only be 60% of women.
And I agree with this assessment. Women all eat from the ill-gotten gains of feminism so they can also be weighed with the sins of them too.
I simply think studies like that are retarded, self-reporting ones even more so, and with women already being retarded it makes extrapolating anything from it useless anyway.
When in reality, as already mentioned, they eat from feminist's treasury so they all are one regardless of what they think.
Self-Reported studies are absolutely stupid in all regards. Would you ask a group of monkeys how intelligent they thought they were on a scale of 0-100 then ask a group of humans how intelligent they thought they were on a scale of 0-100 and then report that whoever answered the highest was in fact the most intelligent? Uhhhhhh, what?
Asking women what they think about anything just confirms how women think about something which doesn't necessarily (and most likely) have anything to do with what you're trying to measure.
Agree entirely. Especially as women are hugely impacted by social pressures, so their self reports are almost entirely "what does this person want me to say" or "what will make me sound better" instead of a reflection of themselves.
You can gauge stuff about them from what they think makes them sound better, like saying they are feminist because they think it means good, but a direct 1:1 dataset is absolute retardation.
Okay, but what are you going to do with that? Are you agreeing with Imp, women need to be collectively put through a Nuremberg trial? Are you going MGTOW? Or is it just an observation that gee, a lot of people hold feminist beliefs? Because again, if we’re being honest, the majority of western men are probably also feminists under this definition.
Would you put a cat through a Nuremberg trial? Most women aren't self aware enough for it to matter.
I agree that most men and women are feminist. It doesn't matter for now because nothing will change; however, as society continues to crumble until it finally reached a tipping point, the feminists (both men and women) will be rounded up and killed or forced to change their beliefs because feminism will destroy civilization. That may sound crazy now but it won't be in another century. There's nothing new under the sun and there's a reason no feminist society has survived long or was ever written about how great their accomplishments were. Feminism is not a sustainable belief system, is dysgenic and leads to a society imploding. Men will realize this eventually and make the needed correction, though not until things get really bad which they will soon enough.