Altruism is leftist pseudo-science to try and claim that giving up your agency to someone demanding something from you is inherently, logically, rationally, moral.
That's bullshit. It's why Altruism basically doesn't exist anywhere in nature, or in human behavior, when taken to it's proper definition (not benefiting you in anyway when you do it).
Instead, you have a responsibility to gain money and power in order to cultivate a moral, integrous, and high-trust society by your actions and asserting your standards via your beneficial actions to your local community.
You remember those people who owned hotels and explicitly refused to sell out to the government for a bajillion pounds? That's the kind of thing I'm talking about.
You have a moral responsibility as someone who works in hospitality to make a small business, run it successfully with integrity, work to promote integrity and hold standards of integrity among all your employees, neighbors, and vendors. Then when the government says, "fuck the dirty gammons, I've got some browns to traffick you like sardines" you can say "eat shit, I don't want your blood money." Then you have a responsibility to not work with anyone who does that, and pay for politicians that will aid you in refuting the larger government.
You have to do that on your level somehow. Maybe you can't start a business (though it might behoove you to try). If you can't then you should explicitly refuse to work with businesses that won't share your values in making a better world. This is especially true if you have developed a skill enough to make you an important catch to someone who couldn't afford someone of your skillset normally; and you need to save enough money that you have a "fuck you money" kind of mentality.
It depends on what the objective, at it's core, needs to be.
If it's the history that's important, maybe it shouldn't be a game and should be something else instead.
If it's the game that's important, then move towards fictional settings where you can use a NatSoc stand-in faction to play the game, but maintain the underlying message that could then be over-lapped onto history by people who are paying attention.
Alternatively, you could do an end-around and make the game free and unpublished, but only available to people who are members of a program or club(this is what some Amish farmers are doing with raw milk).
Theoretically, if I was behind enemy lines like that, I'd start by erasing any and all notions that I am, or was ever British. Then, I'd switch away from paypunk and/or massacard and just use monero/sanitized bitcoin. Straight up give the woke gestapo dead ends and fake news to chew on. Make it impossible for them to even find you. They want to genocide you, you don't need to pay them.
Altruism is leftist pseudo-science to try and claim that giving up your agency to someone demanding something from you is inherently, logically, rationally, moral.
That's bullshit. It's why Altruism basically doesn't exist anywhere in nature, or in human behavior, when taken to it's proper definition (not benefiting you in anyway when you do it).
Instead, you have a responsibility to gain money and power in order to cultivate a moral, integrous, and high-trust society by your actions and asserting your standards via your beneficial actions to your local community.
You remember those people who owned hotels and explicitly refused to sell out to the government for a bajillion pounds? That's the kind of thing I'm talking about.
You have a moral responsibility as someone who works in hospitality to make a small business, run it successfully with integrity, work to promote integrity and hold standards of integrity among all your employees, neighbors, and vendors. Then when the government says, "fuck the dirty gammons, I've got some browns to traffick you like sardines" you can say "eat shit, I don't want your blood money." Then you have a responsibility to not work with anyone who does that, and pay for politicians that will aid you in refuting the larger government.
You have to do that on your level somehow. Maybe you can't start a business (though it might behoove you to try). If you can't then you should explicitly refuse to work with businesses that won't share your values in making a better world. This is especially true if you have developed a skill enough to make you an important catch to someone who couldn't afford someone of your skillset normally; and you need to save enough money that you have a "fuck you money" kind of mentality.
Just as the libs did to seize control, you join the government bureaucracy class.
Become the "spokesman" from XCOM 2
It depends on what the objective, at it's core, needs to be.
If it's the history that's important, maybe it shouldn't be a game and should be something else instead.
If it's the game that's important, then move towards fictional settings where you can use a NatSoc stand-in faction to play the game, but maintain the underlying message that could then be over-lapped onto history by people who are paying attention.
Alternatively, you could do an end-around and make the game free and unpublished, but only available to people who are members of a program or club(this is what some Amish farmers are doing with raw milk).
Theoretically, if I was behind enemy lines like that, I'd start by erasing any and all notions that I am, or was ever British. Then, I'd switch away from paypunk and/or massacard and just use monero/sanitized bitcoin. Straight up give the woke gestapo dead ends and fake news to chew on. Make it impossible for them to even find you. They want to genocide you, you don't need to pay them.