You made a statement (No proof of racial animus) and then referred to police/media as the source so while you didn't explicitly state it you sure as hell implied it.
That could have been worded better to accurately reflect that you weren't agreeing with more than just reiterating what they said such as 'according to media there is no proof of racial animus' or similar to make it a point that they are saying it, not you..
You made a statement (No proof of racial animus) and then referred to police/media as the source so while you didn't explicitly state it you sure as hell implied it.
That could have been worded better to accurately reflect that you weren't agreeing with more than just reiterating what they said such as 'according to media there is no proof of racial animus' or similar to make it a point that they are saying it, not you..
You made that assumption, he was just answering NatalieBiden.