You got upset because I stated facts. You banned me because I stated uncomfortable, but well-documented truths about the behavior of muslims.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17tLFiSLjz/x/c/4ZCaGcS8Trj
Muslims aren't a "race". Nor are they an ethnic identity; they're a cartel of politically-connected international criminals that commit theft, drug trafficking, slave trading, terrorism and murder because their religious teachings glorifies the exploitation of "heathens". It's brazen to the point local government authorities have PSAs warning people not to go to muslim countries "because they were offered a high-paying job" because those muslims do indeed seize people's passports, then force their victims into indentured servitude.
https://bpr.studentorg.berkeley.edu/2020/06/30/modern-day-indentured-servitude/
Your moral failing is that you refuse to acknowledge reality.
Your criticism of Islam has to focus on Islam, rather than Muslims particularly, especially how you worded it as an inherent moral failing among Muslims, rather than claims of over-representation.
Has to? HAS TO? Hahahahahahaha, I'll judge muslims by the content of their character.
After all, the invasive, criminal and exploitative behavior of muslims aligns with the instructions of their warmongering cult-leader. They don't see it as a 'moral failing'.
Thats how they have always been.
They continue to carry out their criminal, subversive and exploitative activities even in the modern day, with the blessing of their state powers and their religion.
And I can prove everything I said.
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-09-02-0315
"The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise."
It's in their 'holy book' and the laws of their religion - which muslims have always used to justify what they do. Stating such is not an 'identity attack'.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110725220038/http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/whtslav.htm
This banditry, invasion, enslavement and even mass murder is what the muslims have been doing in the middle east - first to any other native peoples in the region, then outwards to other vulnerable peoples and nations over the centuries. It is part of their religion. And that has been a staple of their existence since then, and is - even now.
https://mondediplo.com/1998/04/02africa
https://archive.org/details/spain-history-volume-1/page/251/mode/1up
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772719/
https://www.icct.nl/publication/isis-and-their-use-slavery
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/sudan-politics-darfur/
https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-trafficking-in-persons-report/somalia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huddersfield_grooming_gang
https://www.cfr.org/article/ethnic-cleansing-happening-nagorno-karabakh-how-can-world-respond
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxuwDWbYsMI
And as it has been said before, the sole purpose of these vile actions muslims commit has always been to propagate their violent religion, by either force, blackmail or simply ethnic cleansing if their victims refuse to submit.
Secondly, muslims are not above using narcotics, blackmail and sex trafficking to break their targets and poison the communities they infest, either. Then, and even now.
https://www.lancs.live/news/lancashire-news/accrington-soldier-line-drug-gang-24041441
https://www.frontpagemag.com/first-muslim-senator-keeps-california-a-sexual-abuse-sanctuary-state/
https://www.godreports.com/2015/02/uk-hundreds-of-more-victims-in-muslim-rape-case/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telford_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal
They're not above destroying their own children when it comes to sating their perverse lusts either. They don't even care to maintain the next generation in the nations they have conquered either.
https://www.aljazeera.com/features/longform/2022/8/22/sex-trafficking-in-iraq
https://www.journeyman.tv/film/7677
After all, their religion mandates the conquest and enslavement from those they deem 'unbelievers'. This world, and the consequences of their vile actions and depraved ways does not matter to them - their religion has blinded them with lurid tales of an 'afterlife' that pander to their every perverse whim.
The fact that you had to label these facts I spoke of as 'claims' makes you no better than those criminals. You know what that makes you? At best, an ignorant idiot too frightened of offending those savage, slave-dependent mass murderers. At worst, an islamic apologist actively covering up their crimes because deceiving 'unbelievers' is part of your wretched religion.
Muslims and their pet apologists use every iota of their connections and position to label those facts I stated as "identity attacks", "claims" or "islamophobia" or whatever the fuck buzzword you lot cling on to silence all criticism of your so-called religion.
Which brings me to my second point: You tried to divert attention from the behavior of muslims by demanding that I criticize their so-called religion. You demanded that I take part in the lie of seperating islam from the muslims when their own "religious" doctrines specifically exhorts upon them to exploit, extort, enslave and exterminate anyone they deem 'infidels', which they have been doing for centuries.
To your duplicitous demand to "focus my criticism of islam rather than muslims" I say: I don't negotiate with terrorists.
I will never obey your decree to "taqqiya"-fy my criticism of muslims and their vile crimes. I will never take part in the insidious lie of seperating islam from the muslims because the muslims are following their religion, and see no problem with exploiting, enslaving and then exterminating anyone who does not submit to them.
Because without the criticism of muslims and their horrific actions, the criticism of islam simply allows muslim apologists to go "BUT THATS NOT TRUE COMMUNI-uh ISLAM!" and nothing changes. Criticizing the actions of muslims, analyzing their behaviors in enabling slave trading and exploitation of nations at the behest of their "religious" leaders, and the steps that must be taken to ending the global terror of islamic invasion is made clear.
PS: Also, stop using chatGPT. I didn't say anything about "overrepresentation".
PSS: If you're that determined to ban all criticism of your mohammedan leash-holders, then make it a clear law. At least then people will know who truly owns you.
Arabs and Islam are essentially one for one, so one's issues go with the other, but I digress, this is the same jannie who accused me of being a random dudes alt after I corrected myself lmao
maybe where you are, but we've got 250m asian ones just north of us
A decent chunk is asian.
Worldwide, yeah. In the US a small plurality of Arabs are Christian.
This is inaccurate. There are various racial groups that make up different islamic populations. The uighurs in China are asians. The chechens are slavic.
Then again, why am I wasting my time trying to explain to a conpro da joos shitposter? Are you able to recognize (or admit, if you're the fed forum slider type instead of a useful idiot) that evil ideologies are not inherently tied to singular ethnic groups?
The super-majority of Muslims are Arabs and they're where it spawned, Just like how you have Natsoc Japanese and Mexicans for example, yet you wouldn't say the ideation is tied to them and it's a White one, for an obvious example.
Indonesians and Indians are the 1st and 2nd largest portion of muslims worldwide.
Ie honestly consider Indians and other pajeets Arab adjacent. Semi darkies with lack of hygiene who aren't quite white but aren't quite Asiatic either and have scribble language.
Not even close! You could say that Islam is an inherently Arab religion (and I would say that, given the huge importance of Arabic and the Arabic words of the Qur'an), but today Arabs are a minority of Muslims.
Start with maybe 250 million Indonesian Muslims, almost the same in Pakistan alone (and tens of millions more if you include India/Sri Lanka/Afghanistan). Toss in maybe 100 million Turks, 100 million Persians and Kurds, etc. Nobody knows the number of Muslims in China, but tens of millions there. Millions in Malaysia, millions in sub-Saharan Africa, etc.
Comparatively, there are maybe 300 million Arab Muslims. A big chunk, and culturally a very important chunk, but not nearly a "super majority"
Neither nationalism or socialism are inherently tied to whites, either. Especially considering that if that idea had ANY merit whatsoever it would be tied to germanics, not the broad swath of different ethnic groups labeled as "white", you buffoon. It is not even a particularly unique ideology. Nationalism is a cultural element not inherently tied to socialism or any other pololitical ideology either.
Would you actually be foolish enough to deny that the chinese communists are nationalist? Or that the soviets were nationalist? Or the italians under mussolini?
The original Chinese communists were not nationalists because they destroyed Chinese culture and Chinese religion
The Soviet Union were also not nationalist. They hated the Russians, and constantly put them under the boot of minorities. You can read about it in the book called "the affirmative action empire"