I'm allowing you to punish yourself left, right and centre by replying to you.
You chose to reply to me seeking a reply, should I deny you your right in that regard or does being able to say anything you want come with this price like it does for everyone else?
instead of using scepticism to question your own positions on the matter (As is your right).
Either you're a moron, or you've switched to trolling rather than actually engaging in the point because you have no ground to stand on as a pro-censorship turd.
But I must admit, I sometimes can't help myself with bait: try avoiding your pretentious vernacular and affinity for verbosity, and explain yourself. And if it wasn't clear, explain yourself clearly in normal english instead of vague allusions to evolution and predetermined conversational manipulations. Walk me through it like I were a toddler, because clearly there's a disconnect between a person having the right, the unlimited freedom, of speech, and then having to face repercussions for exerting such a right. It flies in the very face of what a right is, and shifts into a privilege, one that is granted at that.
What's that about a strawman argument being used again?
Alec done goofed. He said something that would rightfully get him a smack in the mouth by a law abiding citizen (As has been allowed on many occasions by the law).
I hope that clears up why pissing on the fresh graves of children for YouTube clicks doesn't sit well within the social contract that we each agree to by not killing each other.
Back to the OP; Jones was being a dick and punishing him stops others from doing so. He was certainly over-punished to the degree of farcical. Boeing did actually knowingly murder people and deserve an actual punishment instead of their farcical slap on the wrists which will be absorbed into their profit margins.
All I see here is commies winning (Hiding behind capitalism).
I'm allowing you to punish yourself left, right and centre by replying to you.
You chose to reply to me seeking a reply, should I deny you your right in that regard or does being able to say anything you want come with this price like it does for everyone else?
A want is not a right. You would not be denying me anything.
This is just further cementing the idea that you fundamentally do not understand what a right is.
You are working towards conclusions already set about me instead of using scepticism to question your own positions on the matter (As is your right).
The only person denying you the right to evolve in this matter is yourself.
Either you're a moron, or you've switched to trolling rather than actually engaging in the point because you have no ground to stand on as a pro-censorship turd.
But I must admit, I sometimes can't help myself with bait: try avoiding your pretentious vernacular and affinity for verbosity, and explain yourself. And if it wasn't clear, explain yourself clearly in normal english instead of vague allusions to evolution and predetermined conversational manipulations. Walk me through it like I were a toddler, because clearly there's a disconnect between a person having the right, the unlimited freedom, of speech, and then having to face repercussions for exerting such a right. It flies in the very face of what a right is, and shifts into a privilege, one that is granted at that.
What's that about a strawman argument being used again?
Alec done goofed. He said something that would rightfully get him a smack in the mouth by a law abiding citizen (As has been allowed on many occasions by the law).
I hope that clears up why pissing on the fresh graves of children for YouTube clicks doesn't sit well within the social contract that we each agree to by not killing each other.
Back to the OP; Jones was being a dick and punishing him stops others from doing so. He was certainly over-punished to the degree of farcical. Boeing did actually knowingly murder people and deserve an actual punishment instead of their farcical slap on the wrists which will be absorbed into their profit margins.
All I see here is commies winning (Hiding behind capitalism).