Nope, you'd be the same level of schitzo, but the only issue with it is that I haven't seen people hate blacks, the same way that NatSocs hate jews. Sure, a NatSoc might voice his impotent rage about killing blacks, but it's an afterthought to his primary focus of attention, which is jews.
That's weird.
A racist is a racist. They are concerned about their race. The NatSocs are concerned, primarily, about killing off a different race. And one specific race above all other concerns. That's weird.
I've never met an japanese racist that wanted dead blacks more than keeping his own kids from getting raped by a phillipino. That's weird.
So it isn't about hating Jews at all, that can still be regular old racism.
Its just you hating the NatSocs you see everywhere, and blowing them up to be this irredeemable, completely absurd strawman that you can pile all your generalizations on.
Shit Jews are like #4 on my list after women and blacks, yet somehow by the sheer virtue of disagreeing with you they've moved up to make sure I can fit in your box.
I do think the world would have a net gain without blacks yes, women are more complicated.
But that defeats your position of "I've not seen someone hate blacks like they hate Jews" so I'm sure you'll have an essay on how that's not my real position and yada yada.
Also a joke about "6 gorillion" isn't advocacy for genocide, but I'll let you keep going.
So does it stop being racist if I start screaming about killing niggers and stringing them up? Does racism have a decency limit now?
That's where I'm confused now. Because you aren't making any sense, you just want to try and insult people with retarded accusations.
Nope, you'd be the same level of schitzo, but the only issue with it is that I haven't seen people hate blacks, the same way that NatSocs hate jews. Sure, a NatSoc might voice his impotent rage about killing blacks, but it's an afterthought to his primary focus of attention, which is jews.
That's weird.
A racist is a racist. They are concerned about their race. The NatSocs are concerned, primarily, about killing off a different race. And one specific race above all other concerns. That's weird.
I've never met an japanese racist that wanted dead blacks more than keeping his own kids from getting raped by a phillipino. That's weird.
So it isn't about hating Jews at all, that can still be regular old racism.
Its just you hating the NatSocs you see everywhere, and blowing them up to be this irredeemable, completely absurd strawman that you can pile all your generalizations on.
Shit Jews are like #4 on my list after women and blacks, yet somehow by the sheer virtue of disagreeing with you they've moved up to make sure I can fit in your box.
NatSocs are redeemable, they're just retarded. And these aren't generalizations.
If jews are #4 on your shit list, why would you advocate for genocide for them... unless your advocating for genocide against women and blacks too.
I do think the world would have a net gain without blacks yes, women are more complicated.
But that defeats your position of "I've not seen someone hate blacks like they hate Jews" so I'm sure you'll have an essay on how that's not my real position and yada yada.
Also a joke about "6 gorillion" isn't advocacy for genocide, but I'll let you keep going.