The US State Department first, and then the Soviet Union second, you ignorant faggot.
Once again, we play "six degrees of separation from any jew" with no context. This Communist went as a western advisor, and got imprisoned for falling afoul randomly with Mao (something pretty common-place among the leadership). During this time the US State Department had been pushing the idea that a Communist government was a better idea in China and completely defunded the Nationalist regime. This is mostly because Fabian Socialists who founded and ran the State Department from it's inception supported and were sympathetic to Communists. Similarly, Stalin also backed the CCP with increased funding. By the time that the Americans stopped funding the CCP, Mao had been an obsessive fan-boy of Joseph Stalin.
I love the fact that you are quoting a explicitly progressive outlet and accepting any leftist narrative of history that you can with now outside or alternative information.
If you could literally see facts in front of you, you're obsession with jews would go away. You trying to deflect with an argument to absurdity is nonsense.
Again and again: "six degrees of separation from any jew" is all you are using to prop up your narrative.
The US State Department were explicitly Communist sympathetic, and explicitly funded China. An, single, jew appearing in China and getting imprisoned is not enough. And to be clear: he's a communist. He didn't show up with malevolent intent. He showed up with solidarity to fellow communists.
The US State Department first, and then the Soviet Union second, you ignorant faggot.
Once again, we play "six degrees of separation from any jew" with no context. This Communist went as a western advisor, and got imprisoned for falling afoul randomly with Mao (something pretty common-place among the leadership). During this time the US State Department had been pushing the idea that a Communist government was a better idea in China and completely defunded the Nationalist regime. This is mostly because Fabian Socialists who founded and ran the State Department from it's inception supported and were sympathetic to Communists. Similarly, Stalin also backed the CCP with increased funding. By the time that the Americans stopped funding the CCP, Mao had been an obsessive fan-boy of Joseph Stalin.
I love the fact that you are quoting a explicitly progressive outlet and accepting any leftist narrative of history that you can with now outside or alternative information.
Are jews capable of malevolent intent or is there always a reason to excuse their behavior and divert blame onto some other group?
If you could literally see facts in front of you, you're obsession with jews would go away. You trying to deflect with an argument to absurdity is nonsense.
Again and again: "six degrees of separation from any jew" is all you are using to prop up your narrative.
The US State Department were explicitly Communist sympathetic, and explicitly funded China. An, single, jew appearing in China and getting imprisoned is not enough. And to be clear: he's a communist. He didn't show up with malevolent intent. He showed up with solidarity to fellow communists.
That's a "no" then.
Lying to yourself doesn't change reality, Margarine. You know the answer is yes, you just need it to be no, and you won't listen.