Speaking in a forum is different then speaking to people in real life. I happen to be so disagreeable and hostile that I would actually confront my own employers the way I confront racialists here if such an anti-white discussion were to arise.
How about this: how would you prefer I refute bullshit jew-hatred?
I'm not trying to argue with you or trick you, I'm genuinely curious.
How about this: how would you prefer I refute bullshit jew-hatred?
Well, here's the thing. You've accused me of "bullshit jew-hatred." And I don't think that's something I've done.
My issue isn't with you calling things out. It's you calling specific things out, in a way I personally don't agree with (such as calling anyone who criticizes Israel NatSocs, as I've pointed out, among other things), and in a way I think is biased and often nonsensical.
You can call out whatever you want. You're allowed to think and say what you want, and I'll always defend that. But I'm calling you out because I believe that you're grossly miscalibrated on what is and is not "jew-hatred."
There are people here who say disgusting things about Jews. Absolutely. But you lump anyone who has even mild concerns about Jews, Israel, AIPAC, or anything similar in with the actual "stormfags." That doesn't reflect well on you, that's all I was saying. That's also what I was referring to when I said "sperging," and such. It's - in my opinion - a ridiculous overreaction, that makes you look silly.
Look, for the record, I don't hate you or anything. I agree with you on a lot. But when it comes to this topic you (again, in my opinion) do tend to freak the fuck out, and I have and will continue to criticize you for that.
I absolutely don't think I lump people with "mild concerns". I have mild concerns. I want AIPAC to be forced to have all of it's agents register as foreign agents. France is a better ally of the US than Israel. Israel does not share our interests, and doesn't reciprocate good actions to us a lot of the time. And, they are absolutely not paying back loans when they could be.
The near universal response to me saying this is: "(((You're))) a jewish subverter pretending to get in our good graces. You have never condemned Israel. Those things you just said? You never said, and you never will."
That is happening, repeatedly, multiple times, in this very post. A post, in which, I came to explicitly condemn the AIPAC and the OP of the tweet.
I admit that it is fucking galling to be perpetually gaslit on this issue forever, because NatSocs are Leftists and are unwilling to even consider reason. Hence, why shitting on them is my go-to, and why I consider it appropriate. There is no discussion to even be had. I don't really even feel there is a reason to be respectful, because I know that my comments aren't even going to be read by the person I'm replying to.
I will accept that with this sentence:
"Why, on God's green Earth, am I simply supposed to close my eyes and just assume the only reason people ever die on this planet is because of international jewry?"
I understand why you felt slighted and misunderstood.
Speaking in a forum is different then speaking to people in real life. I happen to be so disagreeable and hostile that I would actually confront my own employers the way I confront racialists here if such an anti-white discussion were to arise.
How about this: how would you prefer I refute bullshit jew-hatred?
I'm not trying to argue with you or trick you, I'm genuinely curious.
Well, here's the thing. You've accused me of "bullshit jew-hatred." And I don't think that's something I've done.
My issue isn't with you calling things out. It's you calling specific things out, in a way I personally don't agree with (such as calling anyone who criticizes Israel NatSocs, as I've pointed out, among other things), and in a way I think is biased and often nonsensical.
You can call out whatever you want. You're allowed to think and say what you want, and I'll always defend that. But I'm calling you out because I believe that you're grossly miscalibrated on what is and is not "jew-hatred."
There are people here who say disgusting things about Jews. Absolutely. But you lump anyone who has even mild concerns about Jews, Israel, AIPAC, or anything similar in with the actual "stormfags." That doesn't reflect well on you, that's all I was saying. That's also what I was referring to when I said "sperging," and such. It's - in my opinion - a ridiculous overreaction, that makes you look silly.
Look, for the record, I don't hate you or anything. I agree with you on a lot. But when it comes to this topic you (again, in my opinion) do tend to freak the fuck out, and I have and will continue to criticize you for that.
I absolutely don't think I lump people with "mild concerns". I have mild concerns. I want AIPAC to be forced to have all of it's agents register as foreign agents. France is a better ally of the US than Israel. Israel does not share our interests, and doesn't reciprocate good actions to us a lot of the time. And, they are absolutely not paying back loans when they could be.
The near universal response to me saying this is: "(((You're))) a jewish subverter pretending to get in our good graces. You have never condemned Israel. Those things you just said? You never said, and you never will."
That is happening, repeatedly, multiple times, in this very post. A post, in which, I came to explicitly condemn the AIPAC and the OP of the tweet.
I admit that it is fucking galling to be perpetually gaslit on this issue forever, because NatSocs are Leftists and are unwilling to even consider reason. Hence, why shitting on them is my go-to, and why I consider it appropriate. There is no discussion to even be had. I don't really even feel there is a reason to be respectful, because I know that my comments aren't even going to be read by the person I'm replying to.
I will accept that with this sentence:
"Why, on God's green Earth, am I simply supposed to close my eyes and just assume the only reason people ever die on this planet is because of international jewry?"
I understand why you felt slighted and misunderstood.