It's like the vaccine, a partial immunity that fades a lot over time.
They can't be sued over the damage the vaccine caused, but they can be sued over false statements about it. You can't sue them for getting myocarditis or turbo cancer, but you can sue for them hiding from you that they knew you would.
Didn't they get lawsuit immunity for it?
It's like the vaccine, a partial immunity that fades a lot over time.
They can't be sued over the damage the vaccine caused, but they can be sued over false statements about it. You can't sue them for getting myocarditis or turbo cancer, but you can sue for them hiding from you that they knew you would.
Does the legal ''immunisation'' also flips-over to the negative after a while and results in a higher likelyhood of lawsuits, and repeat-lawsuits?