What Supreme Court precedent treated "the press" as a class? Name the case. Not how the current administration treats them, or how social media companies treat them, actual precedent that says I'm wrong.
Here's a hint, you can't. In fact, the Trump administration kicked certain pressies out of the conferences. No special treatment there right?
Except it is the interpretation used you buffoon. SCOTUS constantly interprets "the press" as an act and not a group of people.
Stop thinking that authoritarianism can be solved with more authoritarianism that benefits you in the short term you weirdo.
You must've lived in a cave for the last two decades then.
What Supreme Court precedent treated "the press" as a class? Name the case. Not how the current administration treats them, or how social media companies treat them, actual precedent that says I'm wrong.
Here's a hint, you can't. In fact, the Trump administration kicked certain pressies out of the conferences. No special treatment there right?
When did I say that? I've pointed out that it's codified in roughly half the country and in numerous federal district courts.
The supreme cucks are a whole other problem right along with the press, and they'll be dealt with the same way.
Where, what's the law that sets them apart?
Also, the solution to a right being denied to some people in some places is not to deny it to everyone everywhere you dunce.