There's no way that's real. If that's real that's scary. If the SS can stop protected free speech because of a supposed threat to the president then free speech is dead
That's the part I take issue with. It's well established that you can't use someone's likeness without their permission to imply an endorsement of your product, they should have just stuck to the laws on that matter in their C&D.
By putting a statement like that in there they've converted this into a suppression of free speech issue when it should be a rather mundane unauthorized use of likeness case.
There's no way that's real. If that's real that's scary. If the SS can stop protected free speech because of a supposed threat to the president then free speech is dead
Quiet part very loud
https://archive.is/OLakC
That's the part I take issue with. It's well established that you can't use someone's likeness without their permission to imply an endorsement of your product, they should have just stuck to the laws on that matter in their C&D.
By putting a statement like that in there they've converted this into a suppression of free speech issue when it should be a rather mundane unauthorized use of likeness case.