The "win" condition is to ensure all the busybodies and commissars have no power. Trading the woke left for the religious right just means more of the same.
the religious right didn't just include christianity though. There was a lot of jewish and mormon influence as well.
depends. I don't consider religious wars or heretic burnings to be indicators of "good society". A religious society can indeed be a good one, bit it's not guaranteed.
Every society that has ever existed has had some kind of cultural enforcement, including America in its 19th century heyday. This would be what you refer to as busybodies. Church ladies shunning whores, small towns freezing out degenerates, people looking suspiciously at outsiders. Aid societies, music societies, temperance societies. Was the enforcement perfect? No. But it was necessary. Wishing for a society without an order is as fantastical as communism. That society cannot exist.
I mostly agree with your thesis, I simply believe a society can exist without people going out of their way to be tattletales and narcs. People have bent the rules of society without causing harm since the dawn of man. trying to stamp out all dissent and deviance for the sake of stamping out dissent and deviance is just totalitarianism.
non-Christians don't distinguish between Christian denominations. The ones that hate Christians hate all of them and only stand down for the fake Christians who promote faggotry like unitarians.
Find me evidence of reasonably popular atheists speaking out against judaism. I would be happy to be pleasantly surprised if you did but I was in that sphere for a while and can't think of a single one. There are a lot of ethnically jewish or with jewish last names atheists who are rabidly against Chistiantiy and Islam.
Religious wars and heretic burnings? In last 500 years? Maybe in Africa because they are retarded but not in the West. Only jews let grudges that old affect their worldview.
Let's see if you can show me any reasonably popular atheists who are also against faggotry. Because from what I've seen the argument comes down to "If God exists why do I like it in the butt?"
Show me a tyrant that has brought anything but ruin. You didn't grow up, you're just a lazy, cowardly low t faggot craving for a master to serve.
For the record I am not a libertarian. I am a constitutionalist. I don't believe in entirely unregulated international trade or open borders.
The idea that the choice is between libertarianism and being a cuck leftist begging for an authoritarian ruler to save you, instead of trying to save your country yourself, is false, pathetic, wormlike stupidity.
Hitler held power and devastated his country because as a leftist tyrant he cared only for his personal expansion of power. Leftists don't care what they have to exploit they get it, only that they do. And only ruin follows.
Seriously, why do you dim faggots actually try that line? Oh he stopped weimar. And then he sided with the commies to carve up eastern europe and picked a fight with the whole world out of megalomania. Then he fired his best generals and fought the soviets at the same time, because he thought he was a genius, when he was actually just a leftist drunk on power.
LOOK AT GERMANY NOW. You think that's something to be proud of? He DESTROYED his nation and people. Every retarded simp for hitler should be penned up inside Germany. Goblins that lust for a boot on their neck to save them from having to actually do anything themselves don't belong to free nations.
To quote Samuel Adams, who was a hundred times the man Hitler was, or any of you wehraboo trash will ever be
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you."
If you refuse to use power, it will eventually end up in the hands of people who will use it, often against you. Which is how we ended up in this clown world dystopia.
it's not about refusing to use power, it's using power responsibly and correctly. my thesis is simply that power can be used to stamp out authoritarianism. this worked well for the United states, as the authoritarians had to creep into the institutions over centuries for things to get as bad as they are today. compared to other dictatorships or monarchies, that's a very long and drawn-out turnaround. the only reason things are this bad is because the checks and balances against individuals obtaining power had cracks, and we didn't take the time to fill them.
The "win" condition is to ensure all the busybodies and commissars have no power. Trading the woke left for the religious right just means more of the same.
Stop saying "religious" when you mean Christian. Atheism in a western country is just anti-Christianity.
Christianity produces a good society. Gay race communism produces a bad society.
Are there any atheists that aren't giant faggots?
the religious right didn't just include christianity though. There was a lot of jewish and mormon influence as well.
depends. I don't consider religious wars or heretic burnings to be indicators of "good society". A religious society can indeed be a good one, bit it's not guaranteed.
Yes, I know several.
Every society that has ever existed has had some kind of cultural enforcement, including America in its 19th century heyday. This would be what you refer to as busybodies. Church ladies shunning whores, small towns freezing out degenerates, people looking suspiciously at outsiders. Aid societies, music societies, temperance societies. Was the enforcement perfect? No. But it was necessary. Wishing for a society without an order is as fantastical as communism. That society cannot exist.
I mostly agree with your thesis, I simply believe a society can exist without people going out of their way to be tattletales and narcs. People have bent the rules of society without causing harm since the dawn of man. trying to stamp out all dissent and deviance for the sake of stamping out dissent and deviance is just totalitarianism.
non-Christians don't distinguish between Christian denominations. The ones that hate Christians hate all of them and only stand down for the fake Christians who promote faggotry like unitarians.
Find me evidence of reasonably popular atheists speaking out against judaism. I would be happy to be pleasantly surprised if you did but I was in that sphere for a while and can't think of a single one. There are a lot of ethnically jewish or with jewish last names atheists who are rabidly against Chistiantiy and Islam.
Religious wars and heretic burnings? In last 500 years? Maybe in Africa because they are retarded but not in the West. Only jews let grudges that old affect their worldview.
Let's see if you can show me any reasonably popular atheists who are also against faggotry. Because from what I've seen the argument comes down to "If God exists why do I like it in the butt?"
go outside
I'm not a religious right sort, I'd much prefer a secular NS goverment, but any jackboot on these subhumans throats is good enough for me.
The boot remains. "But it's OUR GUY stepping on our throat!". No. All would be tyrants deserve is a rope and a free subscription to knots monthly.
I was also a lolbert until I grew up.
Show me a tyrant that has brought anything but ruin. You didn't grow up, you're just a lazy, cowardly low t faggot craving for a master to serve.
For the record I am not a libertarian. I am a constitutionalist. I don't believe in entirely unregulated international trade or open borders.
The idea that the choice is between libertarianism and being a cuck leftist begging for an authoritarian ruler to save you, instead of trying to save your country yourself, is false, pathetic, wormlike stupidity.
Hitler held power and used it against the wicked, that's the aim, We can all see what happens without authority to put a stop to evil.
Hitler held power and devastated his country because as a leftist tyrant he cared only for his personal expansion of power. Leftists don't care what they have to exploit they get it, only that they do. And only ruin follows.
Seriously, why do you dim faggots actually try that line? Oh he stopped weimar. And then he sided with the commies to carve up eastern europe and picked a fight with the whole world out of megalomania. Then he fired his best generals and fought the soviets at the same time, because he thought he was a genius, when he was actually just a leftist drunk on power.
LOOK AT GERMANY NOW. You think that's something to be proud of? He DESTROYED his nation and people. Every retarded simp for hitler should be penned up inside Germany. Goblins that lust for a boot on their neck to save them from having to actually do anything themselves don't belong to free nations.
To quote Samuel Adams, who was a hundred times the man Hitler was, or any of you wehraboo trash will ever be
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you."
If you refuse to use power, it will eventually end up in the hands of people who will use it, often against you. Which is how we ended up in this clown world dystopia.
it's not about refusing to use power, it's using power responsibly and correctly. my thesis is simply that power can be used to stamp out authoritarianism. this worked well for the United states, as the authoritarians had to creep into the institutions over centuries for things to get as bad as they are today. compared to other dictatorships or monarchies, that's a very long and drawn-out turnaround. the only reason things are this bad is because the checks and balances against individuals obtaining power had cracks, and we didn't take the time to fill them.