No, you're trying to justify low effort passive consumption. THat's what a .jpg post is. If you provide an archive link instead he has to click through and sees the information and knows that it actually existed in that form, possibly before someone retracted it due to online backlash in some cases. If you just keep posting .jpgs you allow people to become lazy, you condition them to passively consume which then primes them for bad actors to come along and feed them a .jpg that isn't real and is instead designed to either demoralize them or to provoke the ones on the fringe who are likely to go off half-cocked and do a terrorism so that the media can weave more narratives and the government spooks can garner more power for themselves.
Again you use rhetoric designed to get people to accept raw .jpgs as true by default in order to prime them for injection of malicious propaganda, all while hiding behind your "proven redpill method" horseshit. This is why I call you a bad actor.
At least one from a few months back, which is far more than is needed to advocate for proper standards.
Now why don't you tell me cupcake, why shouldn't I advocate for archived links of these sorts of things? Why are you so adamant that we be ok with .jpg posts when archived links provide both the information and verification that it existed and wasn't some photoshopped agitprop? What's your angle here?
No, you're trying to justify low effort passive consumption. THat's what a .jpg post is. If you provide an archive link instead he has to click through and sees the information and knows that it actually existed in that form, possibly before someone retracted it due to online backlash in some cases. If you just keep posting .jpgs you allow people to become lazy, you condition them to passively consume which then primes them for bad actors to come along and feed them a .jpg that isn't real and is instead designed to either demoralize them or to provoke the ones on the fringe who are likely to go off half-cocked and do a terrorism so that the media can weave more narratives and the government spooks can garner more power for themselves.
You are a bad actor.
How many of the screenshots you accused of being fake were real?
Proven redpill method.
Again you use rhetoric designed to get people to accept raw .jpgs as true by default in order to prime them for injection of malicious propaganda, all while hiding behind your "proven redpill method" horseshit. This is why I call you a bad actor.
How many, son?
At least one from a few months back, which is far more than is needed to advocate for proper standards.
Now why don't you tell me cupcake, why shouldn't I advocate for archived links of these sorts of things? Why are you so adamant that we be ok with .jpg posts when archived links provide both the information and verification that it existed and wasn't some photoshopped agitprop? What's your angle here?