See, this is where you fail with your left/right distinction. A monarchy can in fact be extremely right-wing as per your scale.
To give you an example. Pretend I am an absolute monarchy and I say the only rules in society are simply, don't be an asshat. The end. No other rules. Occasionally, I utilize my power to have an asshat killed for being an asshat but that's it. You want to tell me that the USA with all its rules and government involvement in people's lives is more right-wing than me because it's a "dEmOcRaCy"? LMFAO.
I'm with you on suggesting that a government that uses its power to force changes in society is more authoritarian than a government that doesn't use its power to force changes but whether the government has power or not isn't a factor on "authoritarian". I would rather be ruled by a benevolent dictator with absolute power who used that power fairly rather than a corrupt fake-democracy like we have today in which the power is used to an extreme degree in a negative manner. If that makes me "left-wing" by your metric then great. That means I'm left-wing.
But your metric sucks because I want a society that would look NOTHING like what a communist left-winger wants. I am a National Capitalist who belies in class-based societies with an Imperium-style military dictatorship ruling the society; however, you would find under my leadership you would have more freedom than what you have today in the USA as long as you aren't an asshat.
my absolute power would be better than their absolute power, only the people I don't like would be put against the wall and killed
You want different things enforced by absolute rule but ultimately you want the same structure as other leftists, just with "your guy" in charge.
You really don't understand how politics works or the point of classification, or why the right left distinction exists. Or why right wing beliefs exist, at that. The only benevolent dictatorship that stays benevolent is one under a literal god. Leftists all share this slavering lust for the world to conform to their fantasy - right wing ideology recognizes and deals with human reality.
Actual right wing beliefs involve recognizing the nature of power and how it is inevitably corrupted. Knowing that the best way to preserve liberty is to deny the concentration of power entirely, to limit the government to only what is essential to preserve this. Your ideology is only superficially different from any other leftist.
And again, purist democracy is shit and I'm not defending it. It is not inherently right wing. Democracy is not an ideology, it is a singular element, like nationalism. You can have very right or left wing governments both be democracies, and the US is not supposed to be a democracy. Universal suffrage is a large part of the corruption
of the US. You goons always want to argue against things I haven't said.
The corruption is from the jews who have all the money and influence. Restricted suffrage wouldn't change the outcome.
And yes, I do want absolute power in the way I want which would be better than the way others want. I would never be corrupted because it's me and I'll always do what's best for me.
Trust me, I wouldn't be corrupted. Just give me all the power. Thanks. You're already ruled by a bunch of corrupt fucks so you've got nothing to lose letting me rule you instead.
I can't take trolling of this level seriously. If this post is actually serious you are the exact kind of fool that powered every bolshevik massacre of the 20th century.
See, this is where you fail with your left/right distinction. A monarchy can in fact be extremely right-wing as per your scale.
To give you an example. Pretend I am an absolute monarchy and I say the only rules in society are simply, don't be an asshat. The end. No other rules. Occasionally, I utilize my power to have an asshat killed for being an asshat but that's it. You want to tell me that the USA with all its rules and government involvement in people's lives is more right-wing than me because it's a "dEmOcRaCy"? LMFAO.
I'm with you on suggesting that a government that uses its power to force changes in society is more authoritarian than a government that doesn't use its power to force changes but whether the government has power or not isn't a factor on "authoritarian". I would rather be ruled by a benevolent dictator with absolute power who used that power fairly rather than a corrupt fake-democracy like we have today in which the power is used to an extreme degree in a negative manner. If that makes me "left-wing" by your metric then great. That means I'm left-wing.
But your metric sucks because I want a society that would look NOTHING like what a communist left-winger wants. I am a National Capitalist who belies in class-based societies with an Imperium-style military dictatorship ruling the society; however, you would find under my leadership you would have more freedom than what you have today in the USA as long as you aren't an asshat.
You want different things enforced by absolute rule but ultimately you want the same structure as other leftists, just with "your guy" in charge.
You really don't understand how politics works or the point of classification, or why the right left distinction exists. Or why right wing beliefs exist, at that. The only benevolent dictatorship that stays benevolent is one under a literal god. Leftists all share this slavering lust for the world to conform to their fantasy - right wing ideology recognizes and deals with human reality.
Actual right wing beliefs involve recognizing the nature of power and how it is inevitably corrupted. Knowing that the best way to preserve liberty is to deny the concentration of power entirely, to limit the government to only what is essential to preserve this. Your ideology is only superficially different from any other leftist.
And again, purist democracy is shit and I'm not defending it. It is not inherently right wing. Democracy is not an ideology, it is a singular element, like nationalism. You can have very right or left wing governments both be democracies, and the US is not supposed to be a democracy. Universal suffrage is a large part of the corruption of the US. You goons always want to argue against things I haven't said.
The corruption is from the jews who have all the money and influence. Restricted suffrage wouldn't change the outcome.
And yes, I do want absolute power in the way I want which would be better than the way others want. I would never be corrupted because it's me and I'll always do what's best for me.
The lack of awareness here is astonishing.
Trust me, I wouldn't be corrupted. Just give me all the power. Thanks. You're already ruled by a bunch of corrupt fucks so you've got nothing to lose letting me rule you instead.
I can't take trolling of this level seriously. If this post is actually serious you are the exact kind of fool that powered every bolshevik massacre of the 20th century.
Go change your fire alarm batteries.
Bolsheviks were jews. I am against jews. I would not have powered the Bolshevik movement because it's jewish.