Wait, Democrats AND Republicans, and it's named the Kids Online Safety Act....
Yeah it'll fuck over the American public, just like the patriot act or obamacare, you can't trust the government with these issues.
I terms of censoring LGBTWHATEVER content, I'm fine with age gating it so it isn't pushed on kids, but that should both be the rating agency and parents responsibility in content curation.
that should both be the rating agency and parents responsibility in content curation.
Excuse me, we're not talking about fantasy violence. Let me present a scenario: is it alright for a parent, under their prerogative, to repeatedly show hardcore pornography to their child? Would anyone have a problem with that not being legal?
I believe there is a place for law to forbid what has been proven to corrupt. You can't prove much with fantasy violence, but there's much argument to make about sexual degeneracy.
it alright for a parent, under their prerogative, to repeatedly show hardcore pornography to their child?
No? But we used to publicly beat those parents and put their kids with a safer relative, typically grandparents or aunts and uncles.
The problem is that it has been shown thoughout history, giving the government the right to make laws that supercede parents responsibilities will ALWAYS be misused and abused. It'd be the definition of insanity to expect NOW the governments will suddenly be able to do their jobs and keep kids safe if we gave them this authority.
If we're talking about realistic scenarios, nobody's taking parents outside and beating them for ruining their kids. On the contrary, we're moving quickly towards an era of celebrating post-birth abortion.
Wait, Democrats AND Republicans, and it's named the Kids Online Safety Act....
Yeah it'll fuck over the American public, just like the patriot act or obamacare, you can't trust the government with these issues.
I terms of censoring LGBTWHATEVER content, I'm fine with age gating it so it isn't pushed on kids, but that should both be the rating agency and parents responsibility in content curation.
Excuse me, we're not talking about fantasy violence. Let me present a scenario: is it alright for a parent, under their prerogative, to repeatedly show hardcore pornography to their child? Would anyone have a problem with that not being legal?
I believe there is a place for law to forbid what has been proven to corrupt. You can't prove much with fantasy violence, but there's much argument to make about sexual degeneracy.
No? But we used to publicly beat those parents and put their kids with a safer relative, typically grandparents or aunts and uncles.
The problem is that it has been shown thoughout history, giving the government the right to make laws that supercede parents responsibilities will ALWAYS be misused and abused. It'd be the definition of insanity to expect NOW the governments will suddenly be able to do their jobs and keep kids safe if we gave them this authority.
If we're talking about realistic scenarios, nobody's taking parents outside and beating them for ruining their kids. On the contrary, we're moving quickly towards an era of celebrating post-birth abortion.
While that's true, this law is way too broad and would cover things that should be up to parental discretion. (and beyond)