yes, the fact that i'm not currently planning a political assassination (pinky promise, CIA!) signifies i would've done nothing to end that North American Street Ape's attack on the spot... anyway, either i'm wrong and we're both wise non-confrontational survivors, or i'm right, and we're both hypocrites who ought to change.
you can play the sophist and say "no, your rules must apply to you and mine to me, i am the winrar" while simultaneously applying lax rules to yourself, but we both know that objectively only one of us is right, and, either which way you put it, we're up the same shit creek facing the same problems.
would you really much rather just keep being smarmy about it? shut your brain off and feel good about yourself? i'm asking in hopes it turns out to be a rhetorical question.
There is no hypocrisy in saying its foolish to throw your life away for a random woman in the current era. That's all I've ever stood on here, in opposition to your own "you are the cancer killing us if you wouldn't!" original post.
Talking around it over and over doesn't change that is our diametric opposition. You've tried to accuse me of several different other beliefs because of that (because apparently anyone who disagrees with you must be XYZ), and its amusing and pathetic that you keep trying to "we should be agreeing bro" after doing that.
Shit nigger, you tried to insult my family for daring to point out for someone who claims to not care you keep coming back. Why do you deserve anything but further mockery?
eh, guess at some point it was inevitable you'd just start rambling. don't feel too bad about barely being able to follow a thread of logic, most people can't. you fit right in.
yes, the fact that i'm not currently planning a political assassination (pinky promise, CIA!) signifies i would've done nothing to end that North American Street Ape's attack on the spot... anyway, either i'm wrong and we're both wise non-confrontational survivors, or i'm right, and we're both hypocrites who ought to change.
you can play the sophist and say "no, your rules must apply to you and mine to me, i am the winrar" while simultaneously applying lax rules to yourself, but we both know that objectively only one of us is right, and, either which way you put it, we're up the same shit creek facing the same problems.
would you really much rather just keep being smarmy about it? shut your brain off and feel good about yourself? i'm asking in hopes it turns out to be a rhetorical question.
There is no hypocrisy in saying its foolish to throw your life away for a random woman in the current era. That's all I've ever stood on here, in opposition to your own "you are the cancer killing us if you wouldn't!" original post.
Talking around it over and over doesn't change that is our diametric opposition. You've tried to accuse me of several different other beliefs because of that (because apparently anyone who disagrees with you must be XYZ), and its amusing and pathetic that you keep trying to "we should be agreeing bro" after doing that.
Shit nigger, you tried to insult my family for daring to point out for someone who claims to not care you keep coming back. Why do you deserve anything but further mockery?
eh, guess at some point it was inevitable you'd just start rambling. don't feel too bad about barely being able to follow a thread of logic, most people can't. you fit right in.
Negro you can't even capitalize the first letter of a sentence.
Though we are perfectly continuing our cycle of attempt at agreement, then insult when it doesn't work. Almost to a fault consistent.
i shall hand you the final word, so that you may go back to your family.