Tucker Carlson on Joe Rogan 4/18/2024
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
That's an arrant misreading of my post, but I do find it amusing your choice of insult is calling me one of the Four Horsemen of New Atheism. How far the mighty have fallen.
Look up Hackel, btw. You might learn something.
When you try to explain your beliefs it's just "bible says so" couched in layers of pseudointellectualism.
I find it sad that you can't just say so directly, and the reason must be that you don't actually believe it yourself. At least some religious nuts have the courage of their conviction and you don't even have that.
Actually, I've given you a credible reason to trust the Bible that you seem to have ignored: it is the best (well, an inerrant) account of human nature, and the evidence for this stacks higher and higher each day. It prophesies severe consequences for those who turn away from God's natural order, and those consequences have come, a lot faster than even most Christians thought. If it was merely the writings of itinerant Mesopotamian tribesmen, that wouldn't be possible.
Simply put, genuine goodness comes from God, and the Bible safeguards it. This doesn't make sense to you, because in your belief system there is no such thing as real good or evil.
That's without getting into the fulfilled historical prophecies of Daniel 2, the fulfilled prophecies of Christ's first coming, the consistency and interconnection across thousands of years, and other demonstrations.
The origin of life and how it developed on Earth has nothing to do with my "belief system" allegedly having "no such thing as real good or evil". You're a very confused person.
At least have the balls to commit to it; say "since the Bible is right about people it's right about everything" not "if".
All the fossils, genetic drifts, computational evolution, and everything else: "devil planted it". Damn, that guy's a way harder worker, way more industrious than Santa Claus lol.
Doesn't it? Someone who commits to abiogenesis usually has little use for a "God of the gaps," and morality is a baseless concept in existential materialism. But feel free to enlighten me.
Do you need it spelled out? Yes, it is.
Genetic information modifying and degrading as it transfers between the generations is useful to understand in real time. There's no reason to marry that to the concept of nascent organs and zoological forms arising over millions of years - except the ideological reason.