Time to shit post without shills.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (108)
sorted by:
You're not. You're not 'backing' your 'allies' because you're obligated to, but because you want to. Even NATO does not require a military response or any sort of response, if you actually read article 5. It's a promise of doing absolutely nothing.
States uphold their 'obligations' based on whether it is in their interests to do so. The most famous example being Italy refusing to join the Central Powers in 1914. Unfortunately, that is often the interests of the corrupt elites, not the people.
The irony here is that, despite being on the winning side by joining the entente in 1915, Italy basically came out of the war as if it had been on the losing side. England and France basically reneged on all their promises used to induce them to flip sides.
Well, Italy also fought the war like it was on the losing side... as usual, losing a great number of men for almost no strategic objectives.