Also, note the sudden shift? Suddenly, if the people on the top are "privileged," it's because they're smarter. Or something. He's right that trying to break people down for being "too smart" is ridiculous, but it's funny that doesn't apply to "white privilege," but suddenly does if you look too deep at who actually has "white privilege."
Also, they're finally admitting the whole "white privilege" thing is racist bullshit. At least that's good.
Lastly, not sure if you saw my post and it stuck, or we just happened to use the same common phrase, but it's funny that I said just hours ago "white privilege" is and always will be a crock of shit. And, to clarify since text can be weird, I'm not screaming "plagiarism" or anything, I just thought it was interesting.
what? white privilege does exist. and as expected, some retards deny its existence. or, admit it does exist but it's fine when white people have it. saying something doesn't exist, isn't the same thing as that thing not existing. you do know that right?
Again. white privilege is in the name. if you see a white person, and a black person. and you willing decided to help the white, because he was white. that's white privilege. many users would happily do that.
Except that is not privilege that is bias, white people being the only ones with an outside bias.
Yes some people will show ingroup bias but on average white people will gladly help the black guy over the white guy.
More then that, every other group except whites has heavy ingroup bias, so by your own logic there is a black privilege that is far greater then white privilege.
Where is the white privilege?
Your definition is bad, your logic is bad and you don't see why what you said before is stupid.
Okay, this is epic.
Also, note the sudden shift? Suddenly, if the people on the top are "privileged," it's because they're smarter. Or something. He's right that trying to break people down for being "too smart" is ridiculous, but it's funny that doesn't apply to "white privilege," but suddenly does if you look too deep at who actually has "white privilege."
Also, they're finally admitting the whole "white privilege" thing is racist bullshit. At least that's good.
Lastly, not sure if you saw my post and it stuck, or we just happened to use the same common phrase, but it's funny that I said just hours ago "white privilege" is and always will be a crock of shit. And, to clarify since text can be weird, I'm not screaming "plagiarism" or anything, I just thought it was interesting.
what? white privilege does exist. and as expected, some retards deny its existence. or, admit it does exist but it's fine when white people have it. saying something doesn't exist, isn't the same thing as that thing not existing. you do know that right?
Saying something exists is not the same as that thing existing, you do know that right?
Why do you have to be so dumb
Again. white privilege is in the name. if you see a white person, and a black person. and you willing decided to help the white, because he was white. that's white privilege. many users would happily do that.
Except that is not privilege that is bias, white people being the only ones with an outside bias.
Yes some people will show ingroup bias but on average white people will gladly help the black guy over the white guy.
More then that, every other group except whites has heavy ingroup bias, so by your own logic there is a black privilege that is far greater then white privilege.
Where is the white privilege?
Your definition is bad, your logic is bad and you don't see why what you said before is stupid.