Former employer already invested that compensation in the employee, by developing his skills and competencies.
Why did he accept the job with a non-compete agreement? Because he thought he was getting enough from it to compensate. Don't take the job with a noncompete if it's not worth it to you.
Employee signed a non-compete for the job. End of story.
Slavery is illegal.
If anything a noncompete is the opposite of slavery; they want you to not work. Hey slave, whatever you do don't pick that cotton for a year! But it's a dumb analogy anyway.
"why did he sign that lease? he could have just been homeless.
Are you talking about leases that say you can't live in the same kind of house for a year, but you can live in any other kind of house? I'm not familiar with those.
Just because a contract contains a clause doesn't make that clause valid or legal.
Sure, that's for the courts and they've said a reasonable-length non-compete term is legal and valid. Because unlike not-gay Jared most people aren't children who can't plan for a year in advance.
Walk away without giving any real reason for your beliefs. What else can you do?
Courts say they're legal and valid, the law says it, and you have given no reasoning against it other than you don't like personal responsibility for your own choices. Oh and it's 'like literally slavery dude, that I voluntarily entered into and am compensated for and can end at any time'. lol
Your ideas a dumb and whiny and your presentation is histrionic nonsense.
Former employer already invested that compensation in the employee, by developing his skills and competencies.
Why did he accept the job with a non-compete agreement? Because he thought he was getting enough from it to compensate. Don't take the job with a noncompete if it's not worth it to you.
Employee signed a non-compete for the job. End of story.
If anything a noncompete is the opposite of slavery; they want you to not work. Hey slave, whatever you do don't pick that cotton for a year! But it's a dumb analogy anyway.
Are you talking about leases that say you can't live in the same kind of house for a year, but you can live in any other kind of house? I'm not familiar with those.
Sure, that's for the courts and they've said a reasonable-length non-compete term is legal and valid. Because unlike not-gay Jared most people aren't children who can't plan for a year in advance.
Walk away without giving any real reason for your beliefs. What else can you do?
Courts say they're legal and valid, the law says it, and you have given no reasoning against it other than you don't like personal responsibility for your own choices. Oh and it's 'like literally slavery dude, that I voluntarily entered into and am compensated for and can end at any time'. lol
Your ideas a dumb and whiny and your presentation is histrionic nonsense.