I really don't give benefit of the doubt to these kinds of arguments anymore, they lost that privilege on the 'you're harming others by not taking an experimental vaccine' hill alone..
In that respect it makes sense, as in my opinion it's WAY worse to make someone live out an existence of pure pain with no hope of curing than to screen the embryo in that regard. Maybe if we could manipulate genetics better we could make sure those traits aren't activated in the first place.
I really don't give benefit of the doubt to these kinds of arguments anymore, they lost that privilege on the 'you're harming others by not taking an experimental vaccine' hill alone..
In that respect it makes sense, as in my opinion it's WAY worse to make someone live out an existence of pure pain with no hope of curing than to screen the embryo in that regard. Maybe if we could manipulate genetics better we could make sure those traits aren't activated in the first place.
TBH, I only do it to give eugenics the benefit of the doubt rather than the idiot poster.
It's criminal that commies got to lay claim to "we're not in a utopia because no-one has tried the real version yet" but the eugenicists didn't.