You mean there are issues with something that is violently explosive at concentrations between 18% and 60%? I never would have guessed. It would be nice if the advocates of its use would remember things like the Hindenburg and Chernobyl and think ahead to the inevitable result of storing it in large concentrations all over the country.
Gasoline also explodes. The problem with handling hydrogen isn't its volatility, AFAIK. It is its tendency to escape any container you try to put it in.
It isn't practical at all. If it was, we would already be using it. It's laughable how many people think there is some grand conspiracy to keep it from being used.
You mean there are issues with something that is violently explosive at concentrations between 18% and 60%? I never would have guessed. It would be nice if the advocates of its use would remember things like the Hindenburg and Chernobyl and think ahead to the inevitable result of storing it in large concentrations all over the country.
Gasoline also explodes. The problem with handling hydrogen isn't its volatility, AFAIK. It is its tendency to escape any container you try to put it in.
And then once enough has escaped, it explodes.
Not unless you're otherwise concentrating it somehow. Anyways IDK what we're arguing about because I don't think hydrogen is a practical fuel.
It isn't practical at all. If it was, we would already be using it. It's laughable how many people think there is some grand conspiracy to keep it from being used.