From my perspective, and having been raised by basically anti Boomers, I disagree with some of this.
Nobody made the Boomers the way they are. They were raised right. Their parents took them to church, taught them useful skills, gave them a foundation to build on.
Instead they collectively bought in the lies of good times and muh equal, and chose to become lotus eaters.
My opinion I made above won't make sense to, or be agreed upon by, everyone because I'm someone who was born on the edge between generations. Our kind get screwed out of opportunities by both ends (like my parents did), so my outlook on the concept of "generational gaps" is negative.
It probably defeats the point of my argument but I don't like the defined ranges for each "generation". There's similarities among those in the ranges but it's not representative of every single person in that hard line range. It's only really become a part anthropology because the Industrial Revolution caused rapid changes in technology that affected culture to the point that people 20 years later aren't psychologically the same as those before them. Prior, things evolved so slowly you could have three or four generations of people be pretty much the same.
Instead they collectively bought in the lies of good times and muh equal, and chose to become lotus eaters
From my perspective, and having been raised by basically anti Boomers, I disagree with some of this.
Nobody made the Boomers the way they are. They were raised right. Their parents took them to church, taught them useful skills, gave them a foundation to build on.
Instead they collectively bought in the lies of good times and muh equal, and chose to become lotus eaters.
My opinion I made above won't make sense to, or be agreed upon by, everyone because I'm someone who was born on the edge between generations. Our kind get screwed out of opportunities by both ends (like my parents did), so my outlook on the concept of "generational gaps" is negative.
It probably defeats the point of my argument but I don't like the defined ranges for each "generation". There's similarities among those in the ranges but it's not representative of every single person in that hard line range. It's only really become a part anthropology because the Industrial Revolution caused rapid changes in technology that affected culture to the point that people 20 years later aren't psychologically the same as those before them. Prior, things evolved so slowly you could have three or four generations of people be pretty much the same.
Good times make weak men