Supreme Court of Canada ruled in a sexual assault case that it was “problematic” for a lower court judge to refer to the alleged victim as a “woman,” implying that the more appropriate term should have been “person with a vagina.” Nobody in the case was trans - Kotaku In Action 2

Supreme Court of Canada ruled in a sexual assault case that it was “problematic” for a lower court judge to refer to the alleged victim as a “woman,” implying that the more appropriate term should have been “person with a vagina.” Nobody in the case was trans (archive.is)

posted 284 days ago by YesMovement 284 days ago by YesMovement +66 / -0

21 comments

21 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (21)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Assassin47 2 points 284 days ago +2 / -0

They're saying that a dude with a dick could be a woman too so you have to be specific.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– ZeroPercentCamoIndex 1 point 284 days ago +1 / -0

But since 'woman' is exclusionary language to them, a dick-having tranny would now have to be called 'person with a penis' instead of woman under their standard. I don't think they'll make many tranny friends with such an approach. Of course, they don't stick to any standards either, so it isn't a concern to them, but I think they're also just too retarded to have thought that far ahead.

permalink parent save report block reply