Of course they don't need to show harm. So called hate speech laws are blasphemy laws, they exist to punish those who trespass against the constant shifting hydra that is the left's orthodoxy.
The UK may have effective Lese-majeste and blasphemy laws under the guise of a new extremism definition in hours that the individual introducing it claims "isn't statutory" but will be treated as such by the Police (which means it IS statutory). A definition that will include a currently democratically elected political party and a man who publicly said he did not like a politician.
Even in woke world don't they need to at least show harm to someone?
A racist meme in a private chat hurt the fefees of whom exactly?
Does anyone have more details on this case?
Of course they don't need to show harm. So called hate speech laws are blasphemy laws, they exist to punish those who trespass against the constant shifting hydra that is the left's orthodoxy.
The UK may have effective Lese-majeste and blasphemy laws under the guise of a new extremism definition in hours that the individual introducing it claims "isn't statutory" but will be treated as such by the Police (which means it IS statutory). A definition that will include a currently democratically elected political party and a man who publicly said he did not like a politician.
They don't even need to show you did something, only that they believe you might do it in the future.