Well, he was wrong about that if he called you a cultist for that. But whatever it was, it's water under the bridge now. Words are air.
Yes, you are a shill if you are refusing to acknowledge basic issues with people you like
This guy was critical of DeSantis regarding his Ukraine comments.
If I were to say, "Larry Elder has no major flaws", that would be a bullshit lie because he lost to Gavin Newsom.
While your point is correct, your example does not actually follow. Losing to Gavin Newsom does not demonstrate that you have major flaws (though no doubt he has). Jesus could lose to Newom, and the fact of losing is not what indicates flaws.
I disagree. Losing to Gavin Newsom, who is now facing a second recall, suggests some kind of major organizational or activism deficiency. He might not have many policy deficiencies, but logistical deficiencies still count.
Contrast that with Lee Zeldin who preformed much better than Larry Elder, and had (and has) a strong political logistical system in the state that is making major efforts to flip it.
Well, he was wrong about that if he called you a cultist for that. But whatever it was, it's water under the bridge now. Words are air.
This guy was critical of DeSantis regarding his Ukraine comments.
While your point is correct, your example does not actually follow. Losing to Gavin Newsom does not demonstrate that you have major flaws (though no doubt he has). Jesus could lose to Newom, and the fact of losing is not what indicates flaws.
I disagree. Losing to Gavin Newsom, who is now facing a second recall, suggests some kind of major organizational or activism deficiency. He might not have many policy deficiencies, but logistical deficiencies still count.
It's California...
I always said that Larry Elder was too good for Oklahoma, let alone California.
Contrast that with Lee Zeldin who preformed much better than Larry Elder, and had (and has) a strong political logistical system in the state that is making major efforts to flip it.