Well, you know you're over target when you get that kind of flack.
Edit: Wow. Just wow. I checked the curator. And it's not oh my god look how horrible this company is. It just says if they were involved. That's it. That's all it does. It's neither negative nor positive, just that SBI worked on it.
To be completely fair, they are listed as “not recommended,” and it is possible for a curator to give a neutral “informational” curation.
Personally I think it’s the right move. If a normie sees an “informational” curation that they’re involved they probably won’t care. Not recommended will make them ask “why?”
Well, you know you're over target when you get that kind of flack.
Edit: Wow. Just wow. I checked the curator. And it's not oh my god look how horrible this company is. It just says if they were involved. That's it. That's all it does. It's neither negative nor positive, just that SBI worked on it.
And this is what they do. Definitely over target.
To be completely fair, they are listed as “not recommended,” and it is possible for a curator to give a neutral “informational” curation.
Personally I think it’s the right move. If a normie sees an “informational” curation that they’re involved they probably won’t care. Not recommended will make them ask “why?”