This is simple, you just go back to being a nation for Whites instead of a dystopian economic zone. Once you do that, you can safely roll back the nonsense of felony restrictions. The idea that you continue to be punished after serving your sentence is absurd. If the person can't be trusted to have their full rights restored then you should have just executed them.
Well if you're prone to any degree of biological determinism the theoretical ideal is to establish a state of people of proven good moral character first before removing protective bandaids like felony gun prohibitions.
Whether an ethnostate is close enough proxy for that for practical purposes is debatable. It's definitely imperfect, Thomas Sowell alone is worth a thousand mainstream media white guys, but it's hard to argue that in abstract it wouldn't be a net positive in terms of removing the most volatile elements of society, given all the data available. But it's even harder to justify the friendly fire cost involved in achieving such an imperfect solution in any real sense, especially in the state of polarization the country is in.
Personally I'd prefer a more measurable approach than a crude race delineation. So the most pressing need I see in achieving it is first making sure everyone in favor of truth, fairness and prosperity are on the correct page on the reality of the situation so we don't end up with good people fighting each other over misunderstandings/misinformation.
This is simple, you just go back to being a nation for Whites instead of a dystopian economic zone. Once you do that, you can safely roll back the nonsense of felony restrictions. The idea that you continue to be punished after serving your sentence is absurd. If the person can't be trusted to have their full rights restored then you should have just executed them.
There's plenty of sayings about things worth doing. They usually come to the same conclusion about difficulty.
Well if you're prone to any degree of biological determinism the theoretical ideal is to establish a state of people of proven good moral character first before removing protective bandaids like felony gun prohibitions.
Whether an ethnostate is close enough proxy for that for practical purposes is debatable. It's definitely imperfect, Thomas Sowell alone is worth a thousand mainstream media white guys, but it's hard to argue that in abstract it wouldn't be a net positive in terms of removing the most volatile elements of society, given all the data available. But it's even harder to justify the friendly fire cost involved in achieving such an imperfect solution in any real sense, especially in the state of polarization the country is in.
Personally I'd prefer a more measurable approach than a crude race delineation. So the most pressing need I see in achieving it is first making sure everyone in favor of truth, fairness and prosperity are on the correct page on the reality of the situation so we don't end up with good people fighting each other over misunderstandings/misinformation.