Based korean men
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
I always laugh when tradcucks don't understand that high age of consent laws are designed by feminists.
You'd think shit like this would at least give them some pause, right? It should go without saying that such things are designed to hand more power to women. An age of consent of 20 isn't going to prevent women younger than that from engaging in sexual activity if they want to. But what it is going to do is give them unwavering power over the men they have relations with. These things gain support under the guise of protecting girls but really are designed as a power grab. It's no wonder the more feminist a country is the higher the AoC is in general.
Exactly. The laws are there to hurt men and that's it.
I don't know why you are under the assumption that boys aren't targets for pedos. Also, the age of consent is 18 in Turkey and Saudi Arabia. It's 15 in Iceland and 16 in Spain. I don't see where you are getting that pattern.
Its a problem of lumping all your "enemies" as a singular entity and assuming thereby their beliefs must also be singular.
The high AoC might be good for the Woke Feminists but its absolutely terrible for the Woke Pedophiles. So either direction you push it towards will be benefiting one of them.
The guy who brought up the age of consent in this thread is an actual pedophile.
https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/17sOZkWc0W/x/c/4Z8inYFjtv7
Good to know, but I wasn't really interested in his mindless drivel.
Only in reminding someone that one group being for something doesn't mean you should be against it.
Actually, AOC laws don't hurt pedophiles at all because pedophiles are going to break the law regardless of AOC laws. AOC laws actually hurt the non-pedophiles that engage in what should be considered healthy relationships with young people.
For example: Imagine AOC is 14yo. A pedophile finds a situation in which they can rape a 9yo girl, so they take it. AOC is raised to 20yo. A pedophile finds a situation they can rape a 9yo girl, so they take it. The AOC law changed nothing for the pedo.
On the other hand imagine AOC is 20yo, a 19yo post-secondary student sees a TA in his office hours. The TA is 25yo. The 19yo flirts with the TA and engage in "consensual" sex (of course, since AOC is 20 and the student is 19yo, the student can't consent so it was actually rape). Everything seems fine but the TA decides to stop seeing the student because the TA didn't like the student's personality in the end very much. The student is upset the TA doesn't want to keep seeing the student so the student claims they were raped. Now the TA's life is over.
As you can see, AOC laws hurt the TA who engaged in a healthy relationship with the 19yo student and the TA is far from a pedo. They should continue on as a productive member of society but now we've ruined the TA's life over nothing. Meanwhile, the actual pedo doesn't care what the AOC law is, the pedo is still going to rape little kids.
Literally nothing in your example has anything to do with AoC. Women over the AoC can also claim rape and destroy your life. College girls are already famous for doing that and nearly every one of them is over the AoC.
Considering rape is already pretty high on the "life ruined" scale, turning it into statutory won't suddenly turn it from slap on the wrist into legitimate problems.
But I don't particularly care about your belief on it. The only point I was making is that the feminist being for it doesn't magically make it something a "tradcuck" should oppose.
Last I checked feminists have also been lobbying to reduce age of consent considerably though.
You talking about troons? Not the same really.
No. They have been doing so for a while now, I think Dershowitz talks about it a bit.
Comment Reported for: Imp alt
That is incorrect.