Just bringing back white men is not enough, because the education system has been systematically refusing to invest in teaching and training white boys and young men for two generations. Yes, male traits and average IQ play a significant role in competency, but those things alone are not enough to solve the competency crisis. We need to invest in training the people who are capable of being competent, and we need to set expectations high enough that they are actually motivated to achieve at the level they are capable of.
On top of that, the plague of fatherlessness has effectively ruined a huge number of young men in the West, and that phenomenon is growing in white communities as well. Boys need fathers to enforce discipline and help them learn the skills they need to be successful. Without that, they're left adrift and aimless, often angry and frustrated, and totally unmotivated.
Combine all those factors, and I'm not certain that the young men of my generation or the Zoomers are really capable of solving the competency crisis even if they're given the opportunity. And as for the Alphas, the lockdown chickens are coming home to roost in a big way. We took a generation of kids and locked them in their houses, denied them access to peers, socialization and anything resembling a decent education during some of the most important formative years of their lives. The damage we've done to their development may be irreparable.
It's almost as if socially conditioning people into being stupid and never training them to be competent might be the cause of a competency crisis.
Frankly, the damage isn't irreparable, they'll actually be fine as they get left alone and build parallel systems. It takes time, but don't be surprised when all the innovations come around rural farming efficiency and gun manufacturing, rather than aerospace.
Diversity and quota bullshit will degrade performance no matter how you slice it. It could literally be by hair color and it'll still happen. Because you want the best people for the job, but now you have to take the best people from a super limited pool of "qualified" diversity hires (and other companies are also trying to draw from the same well).
So what you end up with is paying a premium for mediocre candidates just to fill the quota. The best of a subgroup may not be the best overall.
Also - the person you hired because he has the correct hair color - KNOWS that was why he was hired. He will be planning his lawsuit against the company from day 1 as insurance.
And every one of his coworkers knows why he was hired and can also see him manufacturing grievances and label him a “walking lawsuit”.
I was watching a cooking show on SBS Australia - one where they have a 'celebrity' guest who gets interviewed as they cook their signature dish. Her name was Karen. She told about how she did Engineering at Uni and there were only 2 women on the course - both called Karen. Both passed and went on to big things. She then said she had 2 friends also called Karen who although both were admittedly outspoken and the types to bring grievances to Managers - it was only because they had a lot of experience. My wife's best friend is also called Karen and is also outspoken but Intelligent. They are all sick of the slur and very eloquent in their arguments. I agree with them because 'karen' slur is an attack on White people . White people have standards.
Yes, it certainly doesn't have anything to do with all higher education being Leftist madrassas.
If only more of the communists were white men, surely the authoritarianism intrinsic to Leftism, which seeks to propagate incompetency as a form of loyalty, would have never taken place.
Just bringing back white men is not enough, because the education system has been systematically refusing to invest in teaching and training white boys and young men for two generations. Yes, male traits and average IQ play a significant role in competency, but those things alone are not enough to solve the competency crisis. We need to invest in training the people who are capable of being competent, and we need to set expectations high enough that they are actually motivated to achieve at the level they are capable of.
On top of that, the plague of fatherlessness has effectively ruined a huge number of young men in the West, and that phenomenon is growing in white communities as well. Boys need fathers to enforce discipline and help them learn the skills they need to be successful. Without that, they're left adrift and aimless, often angry and frustrated, and totally unmotivated.
Combine all those factors, and I'm not certain that the young men of my generation or the Zoomers are really capable of solving the competency crisis even if they're given the opportunity. And as for the Alphas, the lockdown chickens are coming home to roost in a big way. We took a generation of kids and locked them in their houses, denied them access to peers, socialization and anything resembling a decent education during some of the most important formative years of their lives. The damage we've done to their development may be irreparable.
It's almost as if socially conditioning people into being stupid and never training them to be competent might be the cause of a competency crisis.
Frankly, the damage isn't irreparable, they'll actually be fine as they get left alone and build parallel systems. It takes time, but don't be surprised when all the innovations come around rural farming efficiency and gun manufacturing, rather than aerospace.
Diversity and quota bullshit will degrade performance no matter how you slice it. It could literally be by hair color and it'll still happen. Because you want the best people for the job, but now you have to take the best people from a super limited pool of "qualified" diversity hires (and other companies are also trying to draw from the same well).
So what you end up with is paying a premium for mediocre candidates just to fill the quota. The best of a subgroup may not be the best overall.
Also - the person you hired because he has the correct hair color - KNOWS that was why he was hired. He will be planning his lawsuit against the company from day 1 as insurance.
And every one of his coworkers knows why he was hired and can also see him manufacturing grievances and label him a “walking lawsuit”.
Actually Karen can. I watched something the other day that opened my eyes.
I was watching a cooking show on SBS Australia - one where they have a 'celebrity' guest who gets interviewed as they cook their signature dish. Her name was Karen. She told about how she did Engineering at Uni and there were only 2 women on the course - both called Karen. Both passed and went on to big things. She then said she had 2 friends also called Karen who although both were admittedly outspoken and the types to bring grievances to Managers - it was only because they had a lot of experience. My wife's best friend is also called Karen and is also outspoken but Intelligent. They are all sick of the slur and very eloquent in their arguments. I agree with them because 'karen' slur is an attack on White people . White people have standards.
They decided that participation and representation were more important than merit.
Yes, it certainly doesn't have anything to do with all higher education being Leftist madrassas.
If only more of the communists were white men, surely the authoritarianism intrinsic to Leftism, which seeks to propagate incompetency as a form of loyalty, would have never taken place.