A study at Swansea University found incels - or involuntary celibates - overestimated physical attractiveness and finances, while underestimating kindness, humour and loyalty. The study's co-author Andrew Thomas said "thinking errors" could "lead us down some quite troubling paths".
Don't believe your lying eyes, bigot. You're an incel because your "thinking errors" are allowing you to see what's right in front of your face, not because women are shallow whores who engage in precisely the mate selection behavior that you're seeing. Let's just ignore all the non-incels who say the exact same thing because that's inconvenient for the narrative. And don't you dare undermine women's AF/BB scam by living for yourself instead of simping. Someone needs to foot the bill for Tyrone Jr. and pint-sized Pookie, and it certainly won't be whore who birthed them or the deadbeats she let raw dog her.
"People are saying that the reason that incels struggle to find relationships and sex is because their standards are too high, and what we were able to demonstrate here is, compared to our group of men that weren't incel, actually their minimum mate preferences were a lot lower.
This is an "experts say grass is green" tier finding, but since "experts" are more likely to say that grass is purple these days I'll give them credit for not suppressing this finding. Still, it was obvious to everyone involved that the "incels are only going after supermodels" narrative is just women projecting their Chad chasing onto romantically unsuccessful men.
Reeeeing about Andrew Tate
This just shows that the "experts" have no fucking clue. Andrew Tate isn't an incel and actual incels hate him. They see him as a Chad, and they hate Chads just as much as they hate women. But sure, keep banging on about the fake rape and human trafficking charges against him because you're too retarded to realize that charging him for the scams he actually perpetrated would have done far more to discredit him than transparently using the exact same tactics that the regime uses to get rid of everyone it dislikes.
Well said.
I get that conservatives want to encourage men to be better, but women need to do a lot better too. The amount of shallow cash grabbing bimbos and cat lady lunatics among women is insane.
You want mr beefed millionaire? Really? Do you even know how to fry an egg? Just insane.
I alone can't do much, other than perhaps raise my kids to be better.
One guy looking for a girl right now also can't do much, other than looking in foreign countries or in more traditional corners for women who have been raised with better values.
As a society we can do a lot, however:
women are group beings, they adapt to their surrounding. If they are surrounded by lunatic lefties, they will be lunatic lefties. So first step: remove them from bad influence.
offer desirable alternatives and blast that idea out like crazy: if they see every housewife being miserable, guess what- they'll not want that. If they constantly see happy moms and wives, they will want that and do what they must to get it. Girls don't put makeup because they think it's fun to sit hours to cake their faces, they put it because society says it's how you do it. So let them see what you want them to be.
make the character sexy: young women look for what they got taught to look for, and they get reinforced whenever some simp agrees with it. So what they need to see is tons of examples of women who brag about their virtues and show how those were useful, and how super awesome their men are because of the men's virtues and character. And at the same time they need to see tons of negative outcomes for whoever lives like... well, like they live right now.
When Peterson says "expect more of young men" he's not wrong. Achieving something gives people self esteem.
But that applies to women too. We absolutely need to expect more of young women.
If you had every girl publicly brag about the killer dish she made for her date, and get tons and tons of positive attention for it, that would soon become contagious.
We can't change women just on a dime, but we can seed the ideas all over the place and reinforce them. And that will change the women.
Don't believe your lying eyes, bigot. You're an incel because your "thinking errors" are allowing you to see what's right in front of your face, not because women are shallow whores who engage in precisely the mate selection behavior that you're seeing. Let's just ignore all the non-incels who say the exact same thing because that's inconvenient for the narrative. And don't you dare undermine women's AF/BB scam by living for yourself instead of simping. Someone needs to foot the bill for Tyrone Jr. and pint-sized Pookie, and it certainly won't be whore who birthed them or the deadbeats she let raw dog her.
This is an "experts say grass is green" tier finding, but since "experts" are more likely to say that grass is purple these days I'll give them credit for not suppressing this finding. Still, it was obvious to everyone involved that the "incels are only going after supermodels" narrative is just women projecting their Chad chasing onto romantically unsuccessful men.
This just shows that the "experts" have no fucking clue. Andrew Tate isn't an incel and actual incels hate him. They see him as a Chad, and they hate Chads just as much as they hate women. But sure, keep banging on about the fake rape and human trafficking charges against him because you're too retarded to realize that charging him for the scams he actually perpetrated would have done far more to discredit him than transparently using the exact same tactics that the regime uses to get rid of everyone it dislikes.
It always the men fault, never the women. Even the conservative right puts all the burden on men being better
Well said. I get that conservatives want to encourage men to be better, but women need to do a lot better too. The amount of shallow cash grabbing bimbos and cat lady lunatics among women is insane. You want mr beefed millionaire? Really? Do you even know how to fry an egg? Just insane.
Okay, but, respectfully, what is your plan to get the women to agree with you and take responsibility?
You can present all the evidence you want to women, but they're just going to rationalize how it was someone else's fault.
I alone can't do much, other than perhaps raise my kids to be better.
One guy looking for a girl right now also can't do much, other than looking in foreign countries or in more traditional corners for women who have been raised with better values.
As a society we can do a lot, however:
women are group beings, they adapt to their surrounding. If they are surrounded by lunatic lefties, they will be lunatic lefties. So first step: remove them from bad influence.
offer desirable alternatives and blast that idea out like crazy: if they see every housewife being miserable, guess what- they'll not want that. If they constantly see happy moms and wives, they will want that and do what they must to get it. Girls don't put makeup because they think it's fun to sit hours to cake their faces, they put it because society says it's how you do it. So let them see what you want them to be.
make the character sexy: young women look for what they got taught to look for, and they get reinforced whenever some simp agrees with it. So what they need to see is tons of examples of women who brag about their virtues and show how those were useful, and how super awesome their men are because of the men's virtues and character. And at the same time they need to see tons of negative outcomes for whoever lives like... well, like they live right now.
When Peterson says "expect more of young men" he's not wrong. Achieving something gives people self esteem. But that applies to women too. We absolutely need to expect more of young women. If you had every girl publicly brag about the killer dish she made for her date, and get tons and tons of positive attention for it, that would soon become contagious.
We can't change women just on a dime, but we can seed the ideas all over the place and reinforce them. And that will change the women.