The vast majority of scientists I know want science to be a welcoming and inclusive space
That's pretty much an outright admission at this point. ACTUAL scientists want to make discoveries regardless of outside influence or "community". My finding > your consensus is literally peak science.
“I also wanted to challenge the use of ‘biological’ arguments in the increasing hostility to trans and non-binary people driven by the government.”
“Discredited reductive and over-simplified ‘biological’ models have been actively used to justify discrimination and human rights abuses, and this pseudoscience has no place in modern scientific inquiry or society.
Translation: it's not real science™ if it goes against the narrative.
The letter adds that research in “many contexts does not need to, nor should, restrict itself to a binary definition of sex or gender,
So their "definition" can change on the basis of "context"? This is an admission that they deliberately avoid clear definitions for the words they use, making debate impossible.
and can be inclusive of intersex, non-binary and/or trans participants without losing scientific rigour”.
Why? Why should biology be inclusive of non-binary? It's like the denial stage of grief: "I feel bad the doctor called me male, so biology is pseudoscience", "I feel bad for my cancer diagnosis, so I'm going to pretend cancer is pseudoscience." This is an admission they bend the "science" around their subjective feelings.
“The vast majority of scientists I know want science to be a welcoming and inclusive space, where researchers of all backgrounds can be themselves and contribute to excellent research.
No. Their job is to look at the evidence. Not "to be themselves".
Honestly? let them keep pushing their ideology into science.
The same think that happened with the media will happen with their "studies" too. The gen pop will trust it less and less until people treat it the same; as just another arm of the bullshitters.
COVID was the start of general distrust in science and the scientists. Now let them dig deeper until they become irrelevant and get defunded. It's going to be satisfying watching a bunch of academics shit themselves when they actually have to do real work.
That's pretty much an outright admission at this point. ACTUAL scientists want to make discoveries regardless of outside influence or "community". My finding > your consensus is literally peak science.
1,900 “scientists” who should be fired/investigated for CP
Who are these "stakeholders"?
Translation: it's not real science™ if it goes against the narrative.
So their "definition" can change on the basis of "context"? This is an admission that they deliberately avoid clear definitions for the words they use, making debate impossible.
Why? Why should biology be inclusive of non-binary? It's like the denial stage of grief: "I feel bad the doctor called me male, so biology is pseudoscience", "I feel bad for my cancer diagnosis, so I'm going to pretend cancer is pseudoscience." This is an admission they bend the "science" around their subjective feelings.
Are they truly going to dewoke the science or are they pandering to the TERFs.
No. Their job is to look at the evidence. Not "to be themselves".
Honestly? let them keep pushing their ideology into science.
The same think that happened with the media will happen with their "studies" too. The gen pop will trust it less and less until people treat it the same; as just another arm of the bullshitters.
COVID was the start of general distrust in science and the scientists. Now let them dig deeper until they become irrelevant and get defunded. It's going to be satisfying watching a bunch of academics shit themselves when they actually have to do real work.